Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steuart Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$380kEnvironment$114kInternational$56kHousing & Shelter$42kHuman Services$33kHealth$22kArts & Culture$10kSocial Science$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mission of Sight$92,564
Bishop John T Walker School of Boys$27,500
Wilderness Leadership Learning$25,000
American Friends of Jamaica$20,681
Annie Wright Schools$8,250
The David Wagga Hunt Foundation$5,000
Atlas Performing Arts Center$5,000
Washington and Lee University$5,000
St Albans School$5,000
First Flight High School$2,500
FK Love Foundation$2,500
Hope Connections$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Evergreen Christian Outreach: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$647k · 16 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$647k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+19%

Still filing today

38%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    American Friends of Jamaica Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56k · revenue +38%
  • AW
    ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $33k · revenue +34%
  • EC
    EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
    3× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BJ
    Bishop John T Walker School
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • MN
    Medstar National Rehabilitation Hos
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • DF
    DWH Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
6
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
9
Tennessee Aquarium

The mission of the Tennessee Aquarium is to connect people with nature and empower them to make informed decisions about water and wildlife.

Animals
10
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
11
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
12
Association of American Law Schools Inc

The association of american law schools' mission is to uphold and advance excellence in legal education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlas Performing Arts Center; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION OF SIGHT: $187,564 · OtherMISSION OF SIGHTWilderness Leadership Learning: $113,500 · OtherWilderness Leadership LearningBishop John T Walker School of Boys: $70,000 · OtherBishop John T Walker School of BoysTudor Place: $42,000 · OtherTudor PlaceANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS: $33,000 · OtherANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLSPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF C: $26,000 · OtherThe David Wagga Hunt Foundation: $25,000 · OtherBishop John T Walker School: $24,800 · Other+13 more: $45,730 · Other+13 moreAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $55,681 · InternationalAmerican …+1 more: $700 · InternationalEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $30,500 · Human ServicesWashington and Lee University: $25,000 · EducationATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,510 · HealthCreatio Inc: $258 · EnvironmentRock Creek Conservancy Inc: $250 · Environment
Other$567,594International$56,381Human Services$30,500Education$25,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$1,510Environment$508

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $55,681 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS: $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $30,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREKKING FOR KIDS INC: $700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCreatio Inc: $258 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRock Creek Conservancy Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Friends of Jamaica Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TREKKING FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Creatio Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rock Creek Conservancy Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steuart Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steuart Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 60%
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc: 60% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steuart’s filings →

More from the funding graph