Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stephen S and Anne E K Matter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$31kEducation$5kHuman Services$4kCrime & Legal$1kOther$18k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM$5,000
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL$1,000
MCLEAN COUNTY MUSEUM OF HISTORY$1,000
MCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER$1,000
LIFELONG ACCESS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $2k → 11%LIFELONG ACCESS: $1k → 11%LIFELONG ACCESS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$48k · 7 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$48k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+38%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +84%
  • TO
    TOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +204%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • HS
    HOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +53%
  • MF
    MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFPgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +38%
  • CP
    CHILD PROTECTION NETWORK
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
2
Mclean Co Chamber of Commerce

To support and serve our members, the mclean county chamber of commerce strives to promote commerce, advocate pro-business prospectives, collaborate to lead change, and engage in action for results that strengthen the prosperity of the…

3
Mclean County Center for Human Services Inc

The center's mission is to assist persons in mclean county who are in need of behavioral health services.

Human Services
4
Mclean County Farm Bureau

To improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family life in mclean county.

5
Community Health Care Clinic

Provide quality health care to mclean county's medically underserved residents through the operation of a free medical clinic.

Health
6
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
8
The Community Service Center of Northern Champaign County Inc

To support residents of northern champaign county by providing services dedicated to improving their social conditions and ensuring access to the resources they need.

Human Services
9
Children's Law Center Inc

Children's law center believes every child should grow up with a strong foundation of family, health and education and live in a world free from poverty, trauma, racism, and other forms of oppression. our more than 100 staff together with…

Crime & Legal
10
The Childrens Museum of Siouxland Inc

Provide an interactive learning environment for children to foster imagination and creativity while inspiring life-long learning

Arts & Culture
11
Child Advocacy Center of Mchenry Co Inc

Provide Counselors in Child Abuse Situations

Crime & Legal
12
Central Illinois Neuroscience Found

To further the education of healthcare providers in the neurosciences, provide community education with an emphasis on public awareness of neurological disorders, and support and conduct clinical and pre-clinical research in the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mclean County Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is Child Protection Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER — $12,450 · Arts & CultureMCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTERTOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $12,000 · Arts & CultureTOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONMCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $7,000 · Arts & CultureMCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL — $7,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON-N…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $5,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 · OtherHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INCSAFE HARBOR — $2,000 · OtherSAFE HARBOR+3 more — $1,100 · Other+3 moreILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationILLINOIS …MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $2,000 · Human ServicesLIFELONG ACCESS — $2,000 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTION NETWORK — $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$31,450Other$18,100Education$5,000Human Services$4,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER — $12,450 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTOWN OF NORMAL CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON-NORMAL — $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMCLEAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $7,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELONG ACCESS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD PROTECTION NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Parker Kemp FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Parker Kemp Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Illinois Prairie Community Foundation Inc · The Growmark Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Snyder Family Foundation Nfp · Russell and Betty Shirk Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stephen S and Anne E K Matter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph