Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen F Quill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$270kYouth Development$116kEducation$97kHuman Services$62kPublic Benefit$17kEnvironment$14kAnimals$13kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$15,000
MASS OUTDOOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
BANCROFT SCHOOL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIEND'S OF THE LANCASTER SENIORS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 22 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2021, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
20

Total granted

$549k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+151%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $189k · revenue +162%
  • RG
    RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • BS
    BANCROFT SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TS
    TOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • UM
    UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
2
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
7
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
8
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
9
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
10
Duxbury Beach Reservation Inc

Preserve duxbury beach to safeguard adjacent bays and mainland, protect wildlife and vegetation while welcoming the public to enjoy.

Environment
11
The Red Sox Foundation Inc

The red sox foundation's mission is to harness the passion of red sox nation to make a difference in the lives of children, veterans, families and our communities in need throughout new england by improving their health, educational and…

Philanthropy
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Forestry Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greeley Hill Boys Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATION: $116,325 · OtherGREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATIONCLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $90,428 · OtherCLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSUMASS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $36,000 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · OtherTOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INCWHEAT: $25,000 · OtherWHEATTOWN OF LANCASTER: $16,950 · Other+24 more: $55,750 · Other+24 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $189,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $9,516 · EnvironmentNASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC: $1,950 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $450 · Environment+2 more: $450 · EnvironmentBANCROFT SCHOOL: $6,500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC: $5,500 · PhilanthropyCASA PROJECT INC: $1,500 · Civil RightsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $400 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$395,453Health$189,000Environment$12,366Education$6,600Philanthropy$5,500Civil Rights$1,500Recreation & Sports$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $189,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATION: $116,325 over 3y, 51% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $9,516 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBANCROFT SCHOOL: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC: $1,950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARROLL SCHOOL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BANCROFT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Lancaster Seniors Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MASS BASEBALL LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARROLL SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Central MaMA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Ma · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Fallon Community Health Plan Inc · United Way of Central Massachusetts Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen F Quill Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen F Quill Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Veterans Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Nashua River Watershed Assoc Inc: 54% of income from government
  • United Way of Tri County Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stephen F Quill Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stephen F Quill Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stephen F Quill Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph