Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stephen F Quill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2021
3
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Health$270kYouth Development$116kEducation$97kHuman Services$62kPublic Benefit$17kEnvironment$14kAnimals$13kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2021 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$15,000
MASS OUTDOOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION$10,000
BANCROFT SCHOOL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIEND'S OF THE LANCASTER SENIORS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$549k · 22 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
20

Total granted

$549k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+151%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $189k · revenue +132%
  • RG
    RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • BS
    BANCROFT SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TS
    TOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • UM
    UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
2
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
7
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
8
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
9
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc

To protect the nature of massachusetts for people and for wildlife through education, land conservation, advocacy, scientific research, and habitat stewardship/restoration.

Environment
10
Duxbury Beach Reservation Inc

Preserve duxbury beach to safeguard adjacent bays and mainland, protect wildlife and vegetation while welcoming the public to enjoy.

Environment
11
The Red Sox Foundation Inc

The red sox foundation's mission is to harness the passion of red sox nation to make a difference in the lives of children, veterans, families and our communities in need throughout new england by improving their health, educational and…

Philanthropy
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Forestry Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greeley Hill Boys Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#19#8#18#23#15#17#0
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATION — $116,325 · OtherGREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATIONCLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $90,428 · OtherCLINTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSUMASS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $36,000 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHEAT — $25,000 · OtherWHEATTOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 · OtherTOURETTE SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INCTOWN OF LANCASTER — $16,950 · Other+24 more — $55,750 · Other+24 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $189,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY — $9,516 · EnvironmentNASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC — $1,950 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $450 · Environment+2 more — $450 · EnvironmentBANCROFT SCHOOL — $6,500 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $5,500 · PhilanthropyCASA PROJECT INC — $1,500 · Civil RightsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC — $400 · Recreation & SportsCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$395,453Health$189,000Environment$12,366Education$6,600Philanthropy$5,500Civil Rights$1,500Recreation & Sports$650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $189,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATION — $116,325 over 3y, 51% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY — $9,516 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBANCROFT SCHOOL — $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC — $1,950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARROLL SCHOOL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds GREELEY HILL BOYS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY
  • Who funds BANCROFT SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC
  • Who funds NASHUA RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC INC
  • Who funds CASA PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Friends of the Lancaster Seniors Inc
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CENTRAL MASS BASEBALL LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC
  • Who funds THE CARROLL SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Central MaMA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Ma · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Fallon Community Health Plan Inc · United Way of Central Massachusetts Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stephen F Quill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 18%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc88% of income from government
  • Veterans Inc58% of income from government
  • Nashua River Watershed Assoc Inc54% of income from government
  • United Way of Tri County Inc18% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stephen F Quill Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stephen F Quill Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph