Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen D Taylor Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Arts & Culture$286kEducation$83kPhilanthropy$28kAnimals$26kReligion$22kHuman Services$11kHealth$4kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $48,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TELFAIR MUSEUMS$22,500
CRISTO REY ATLANTA JESUIT HS$20,000
TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
SCHEDEL ARBORETUM & GARDENS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES: $1k → 7%RUTH ANGELS: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDERN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 8%CRISTO REY ATLANTA JESUIT HS: $20k → 13%WORMSLOW INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%MASON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 6%SCHEDEL ARBORETUM & GARDENS: $3k → 10%ST ROSE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $6k → 12%ST URSULA ACADEMY: $10k → 18%ENVISION EXTRAORDINARY CAMP: $25k → 6%HOLLINS UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%DETROIT PUBLIC TELEVISION: $15k → 8%CRISTO REY ATLANTA JESUIT HS: $20k → 13%SCHEDEL ARBORETUM & GARDENS: $1k → 10%ST ROSE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 12%ST URSULA ACADEMY: $10k → 18%LAMBIE'S LEGACY: $3k → 12%SUSAN KOMEN NW OHIO: $5k → 18%HOSPICE OF NW OHIO: $2k → 12%SUSAN KOMEN NW OHIO: $5k → 18%HOSPICE OF NW OHIO: $1k → 12%SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME: $10k → 18%ST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 18%ST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 18%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL 2017: $1k → 18%TOLEDO LUCUS COUNTY MEMORIAL DAY: $4k → 18%TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 18%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF GREAT LAKES: $3k → 18%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF GREAT LAKES: $1k → 18%IMAGINATION STATION: $25k → 18%TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 18%TOLEDO SYMPHONY: $3k → 18%TOLEDO ZOO: $25k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 9 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$166k
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+48%

Still filing today

33%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureAnimalsInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +50%
  • TJ
    THE JOSEPH J & MARIE P SCHEDEL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +105%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $165k · revenue +34%
  • IS
    IMAGINATION STATION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
3
Heckscher Museum

Museum has a mission to create opportunties for everyone to experience art that broadens understanding of the past, fosters community connections to the present, and creates diverse possbilities for the future.

Arts & Culture
4
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
5
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
6
Toledo Science Center

Empower everyone to explore the sciences through interactive exhibits and educational programming.

Arts & Culture
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
The Dayton Art Institute

The dayton art institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all.

Arts & Culture
9
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
10
New Orleans Museum of Art

The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.

Arts & Culture
11
Toledo Regional Chamber of Commerce

To solve critical business challenges in order to create vibrant economic opportunities for all in our region.

—
12
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toledo Museum of Art; the most unlike its peers is Mustard Seed Communities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $165,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ARTTELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureTELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INCDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIACRISTO REY ATLANTA JESUIT HS: $40,000 · OtherCRISTO REY ATLANTA JESUIT HSIMAGINATION STATION: $25,000 · OtherIMAGINATION STATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST URSULA ACADEMY: $20,000 · OtherST URSULA ACADEMYST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherST JOHNS HIGH SCHOOLMASON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · OtherMASON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCST ROSE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherSUSAN KOMEN NW OHIO: $10,000 · OtherSISTERS OF NOTRE DAME: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $28,000 · Other+10 moreTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $2,500 · EducationMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $1,000 · International
Arts & Culture$235,000Other$209,000Animals$25,500Philanthropy$25,000Education$2,500International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $165,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOSEPH J & MARIE P SCHEDEL FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds TELFAIR MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSEPH J & MARIE P SCHEDEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · George Isaac Foundation · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation · Edward Lamb Foundation Inc · Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · Promedica Health System Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ibm International Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen D Taylor Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen D Taylor Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephen D Taylor Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stephen D Taylor Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen D Taylor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph