Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stenstrom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$468kYouth Development$115kHealth$78kHuman Services$58kCommunity Improvement$27kHousing & Shelter$14kRecreation & Sports$11kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$51,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$20,000
ROCKFORD PROMISE$20,000
TRANSFORM ROCKFORD$16,500
REMEDIES$3,500
ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION$3,000
CASA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
VARIOUS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EMBRACE LIVING CHARITIES: $3k → 7%COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY SOLU: $500 → 15%WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $500 → 15%CARPENTER'S PLACE: $3k → 15%CARPENTER'S PLACE: $3k → 15%CARPENTER'S PLACE: $3k → 15%CARPENTER'S PLACE: $2k → 15%CARPENTER'S PLACE: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$943k · 20 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$943k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+71%

Still filing today

45%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RV
    ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $329k · revenue +137%
  • RP
    ROCKFORD PROMISE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $135k · revenue ×13
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD
    5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • IE
    Illinois Executive Mansion Association
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -100%
  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH DEVEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • EL
    EMBRACE LIVING CHARITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
2
Rockford Regional Health Council

Rockford regional health council is a not-for-profit social service corporation organized under the laws of the state of illinois for the purpose of improving community health through data gatering and analysis, education and advocacy.

—
3
Rockford Community Investment Fund

To support housing and community development ventures

Community Improvement
4
Rockford Bell Credit Union

Rockford Bell Credit Union is a member owned community credit union chartered by the state. We are dedicated to providing quality financial service for our membership.

—
5
Rockford Area Strategic Initiatives

The primary role of the rockford area strategic initiative is to enhance education, commerce, trade and economic development in the rockford region

Community Improvement
6
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
7
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
8
Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley

To provide effective and rewarding ways for donors to fulfill their philanthropic objectives by administering charitable funds that distribute grants and scholarships to benefit the citizens of kane and kendall counties of illinois…

Philanthropy
9
Rockford Area Economic Development Council Inc

The rockford area economic development council cultivates opportunities for primary job growth that increase the economic well-being of our region

—
10
Mosaic Illinois Housing of Rockford I

The organization provides low income affordable housing under illinois housing development authority guidelines.

Health
11
The Rockford Institute

To provide analysis and commentary on cultural, economic, political, and educational issues through a published monthly opinion magazine and to operate continuing adult educational conferences in american and european literature and…

—
12
Rockford Area Community Endowment

Rockford area community endowment is a local foundation committed to assisting rockford area residents, businesses, government and volunteer organizations to expand opportunities locally. race was founded in 1964.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rosecrance Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Transform Rockford. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $328,500 · EducationROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONROCKFORD PROMISE: $134,500 · EducationROCKFORD PROMISE+1 more: $2,500 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $153,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $60,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD: $55,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORDYMCA ROCK RIVER VALLEY: $54,283 · OtherYMCA ROCK RIVER VALLEYREMEDIES: $30,500 · OtherREMEDIES+18 more: $64,600 · Other+18 moreROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyTRANSFORM ROCKFORD: $26,500 · Community Improvement+1 more: $750 · Community ImprovementCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE LIVING CHARITIES: $2,500 · Human ServicesWINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA: $500 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC: $500 · Human ServicesNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $10,500 · Food & NutritionOSF Healthcare Foundation: $5,000 · HealthFAIRHAVEN CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT CENTER: $1,500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$465,500Other$417,383Philanthropy$27,250Community Improvement$27,250Human Services$13,500Food & Nutrition$10,500Health$5,000Housing & Shelter$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $328,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetROCKFORD PROMISE: $134,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD: $55,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSFORM ROCKFORD: $26,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetSwedishAmerican Health Foundation: $11,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARPENTER'S PLACE INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Executive Mansion Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRHAVEN CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER DISTRICT: $750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northern IL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCK VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ASSOCIATION OF ROCKFORD ↗
  • Who funds ROSECRANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORM ROCKFORD ↗
  • Who funds SwedishAmerican Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Executive Mansion Association ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACE LIVING CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FAIRHAVEN CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RIVER DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds WINNEBAGO COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Northern IL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · John T Wolf Charitable Trust II · Amended and Restated Brubaker Charitable Trust · Rydell Family Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Midland States Bank Foundation · The Mill Foundation · Jeffrey R Anderson Charitable Foundation · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · United Way of Rock River Valley

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stenstrom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stenstrom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stenstrom Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stenstrom Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stenstrom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph