Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stems Macarthur Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$179kInternational$53kEnvironment$21kPublic Benefit$17kHousing & Shelter$16kHealth$13kEducation$9kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$271k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN ARTS$20,000
PROPUBLICA$6,000
UNICEF USA$5,000
DEMOCRACY NOW$2,000
INST FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES$1,200
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
UC BERKELY FOUNDATION$1,000
CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPARD$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
NY
IA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$341k · 15 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
23

Total granted

$341k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+37%

Still filing today

80%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentPublic BenefitHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    4× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +47%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    4× · 2018–2021 · $27k · revenue +51%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +86%
  • PF
    Pets for Vets Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +67%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
4
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
6
World Monuments Fund Inc

Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…

Arts & Culture
7
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
10
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
11
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $186,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTSHabitat for Humanity: $16,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanityST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $13,000 · Other+22 more: $36,500 · Other+22 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $30,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND …United States Association for UNHCR: $27,000 · InternationalUnited States Assoc…INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES: $7,200 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR SUSTA…+2 more: $2,000 · InternationalDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $15,500 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY …PRO PUBLICA INC: $12,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLIC…CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATIO…NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL W…HONOR THE EARTH: $10,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentPets for Vets Inc: $5,000 · Public BenefitVeterans For Peace Inc: $2,000 · Public BenefitNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $5,000 · Education
Other$251,500International$66,200Arts & Culture$34,500Environment$11,500Public Benefit$7,000Civil Rights$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $186,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $16,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES: $7,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPets for Vets Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAncestral Knowledge Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVeterans For Peace Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Pets for Vets Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Ancestral Knowledge Inc ↗
  • Who funds Veterans For Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stems Macarthur Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stems Macarthur Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Institute for Sustainable Communities: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stems Macarthur Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stems Macarthur Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stems Macarthur’s filings →

More from the funding graph