Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stella B Gross Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$530kHuman Services$298kHealth$145kYouth Development$110kArts & Culture$60kCrime & Legal$58kHousing & Shelter$55kAnimals$50kOther$0
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AFRICAN DIASPORA NETWORK$70,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$40,000
SAN JOSE SPORTS AUTHORITY$30,000
CRISTO REY SAN JOSE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$20,000
BELLARMINE COLLEGE PREP$15,000
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
CHILD ADVOCATES$15,000
HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY$10,000
LADIES OF CHARITY$10,000
UNITED VETERANS COUNCIL$10,000
SAN JOSE AUX L PACKARD CHLDRENS HOSP$10,000
VIA SERVICES$10,000
OUR CITY FOREST$5,000
ST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $5k → 8%LADIES OF CHARITY: $15k → 8%LADIES OF CHARITY: $10k → 8%LADIES OF CHARITY: $10k → 8%LADIES OF CHARITY: $10k → 8%LADIES OF CHARITY: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 27 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
21

Total granted

$1.5M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

48%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEmploymentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    6× · 2021–2026 · $148k · revenue +34%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2021–2026 · $130k · revenue +54%
  • LO
    LADIES OF CHARITY
    5× · 2021–2026 · $50k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TF
    TOWER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • VH
    VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $25k · revenue +231%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
2
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Student Union of San Jose State University

The student union of san jose state university (the "student union") is an auxiliary organization in the california state university ("csu") system. the purposes of the student union are to provide cultural, educational, social and…

Education
5
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
6
Silicon Valley Council of Nonprofits

To advance the role, voice, and capacity of the nonprofit community so it can be a force for positive social change and support the creation of equitable, vibrant, and thriving communities.

Education
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund - SV2

Silicon Valley Social Venture Funds (SV2) mission is to unleash the talents and resources of the Bay Area community to achieve meaningful social impact. SV2 works to build the organizational capacity of our Nonprofit Grantees and Impact…

Philanthropy
9
Silicon Valley Employers' Forum

Coalition of employers with mission to build collective intelligence regarding corporate and employee benefits and to address international benefit issues from the perspective of multi-national employers.

Education
10
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
11
Destination Home Sv co Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Destination: home's mission is to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in santa clara county.

Housing & Shelter
12
Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network

The mission of joint venture is to foster the health and vitality of silicon valley for all the people who live and work here. we pursue our mission by (1) providing data, research and analysis through our research arm, the institute for…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Jose State University Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is African Diaspora Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $250,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside CountiesBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREP: $95,000 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $95,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOLBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $60,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $60,000 · OtherUNITED VETERANS COUNCIL INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $52,500 · OtherVIA REHAB SERVICES: $52,500 · OtherUSA WEST PROVINCE SOCIETY OF JESUS: $45,000 · Other+26 more: $427,500 · Other+26 morePRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $147,500 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TR…CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $130,000 · EducationCRISTO REY SAN JOSE H…Informed Parents of Silicon Valley Inc: $27,500 · EducationInformed Parents of S…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES…SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationJW HOUSE: $30,000 · HealthVIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $27,500 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $25,000 · HealthAfrican Diaspora Network: $70,000 · InternationalSAN JOSE LIGHT TOWER CORPORATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCITY LIGHTS THEATER CO OF SAN JOSE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureLADIES OF CHARITY: $50,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $5,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $40,000 · Animals
Other$1,197,500Education$355,000Health$82,500International$70,000Arts & Culture$60,000Human Services$55,000Animals$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $250,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $147,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $130,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAN JOSE LIGHT TOWER CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetLADIES OF CHARITY: $50,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJW HOUSE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetOUR CITY FOREST: $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetInformed Parents of Silicon Valley Inc: $27,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetVIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $27,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEOPontes Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF SAN JOSE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds African Diaspora Network ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 55 SILICON VALLEY MONTEREY BAY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE LIGHT TOWER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LADIES OF CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds JW HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN JOSE SPORTS AUTHORITY ↗
  • Who funds OUR CITY FOREST ↗
  • Who funds Informed Parents of Silicon Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds VIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds GEOPontes Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKIZU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Catholic Community FoundationCA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Catholic Community Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Hugh Stuart Center Charitable Trust · The Valley Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The Davidson Family Foundation · The Brandenburg Family Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · American Gift Fund · Ravizza Family Foundation · Mission City Community Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stella B Gross Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stella B Gross Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stella B Gross’ filings →

    More from the funding graph