How much did STAUNTON FARM FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of STAUNTON FARM FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

infrastructurestartluncheonmodelintegrated carepleareduction

2019

specialisttransitionconnectchallengeskalsonspaceyoung

2020

covid responsetelehealthcoronavirustele-healthawakenbetterresponse covid

2021

teacheraid traininginformed trainingtrauma informedhealth aidbenefitingaction

2022

teen outreachelectronicrecordssystemyouth mentalmemorystaff

2023

planadvancingwellness programmingayudatesociallossreelabilities

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k21 grants · $36k
$10k–50k46 grants · $1.2M
$50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$68M

Total assets

Largest grants

GWEN'S GIRLS$200,000
HEALTHY START INC$166,484
METRO COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$150,000
YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY$138,000
BEAVER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$125,000
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES$125,000
JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES$119,405
DISABILITY LEAD$100,000
YOUNG BLACK MOTIVATED KINGS AND QUEENS$100,000
NEW SUN RISING$100,000
FIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC$98,600
ADELPHOI$95,000
1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY$75,000
CHABAD HOUSE ON CAMPUS INC$75,000
HOSANNA HOUSE INC$75,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$12M · 119 repeat orgs$9.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

119 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 74 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119

248

Total granted

$12M

$8.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%

+41%

Still filing today

65%

41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NA
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES
5× · 2019–2024 · $753k · revenue +111%
NS
NEW SUN RISING
6× · 2018–2024 · $431k · revenue +69%
AP
AWAKEN PITTSBURGH
5× · 2018–2024 · $250k · revenue +35% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

FR
FRED ROGERS PRODUCTIONS
one grant, 2018 · $300k
PC
PRIMARY CARE HEALTH SERVICESgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +37%
FI
FAMILYLINKS INC - GRANTS
one grant, 2017 · $249k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh

Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…

Human Services

Action Wellness

Provide broad range of services to people in philadelphia infected and affected by the hiv disease and other chronic illnesses.

Health

Pathways Pa Inc

To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…

Human Services

Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.

Employment

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Community Counseling Center

To provide behavioral health services to individuals and families with mental health or substance abuse and related problems.

Health

Pittsburgh Action Against Rape

To respond, educate, and advocate to end sexual violence.

Health

Cafe Momentum Pittsburgh

Cafe momentum pittsburgh transforms young lives by equipping the community's most at-risk youth with life skills, education and employment opportunities to help them achieve their full potential.

Crime & Legal

Transitions of Pa

Transitions is a crisis center that provides advocacy, empowerment, and education to victims, survivors, families, and communities to end patterns of violence and abuse.

Human Services

Pennsylvania Women Work

Pa women work empowers women to prepare for and find lasting employment that pays a family-sustaining wage. the mission of the organization is to transform womens lives through empowerment, employment and economic independence.

Human Services

Connections Work

Provides services, support and community reintegration to individuals in the justice system

—

Community Action Commission

Community action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%2/215

the rest of the field

895/14,294

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

209 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

202/209

Grantees still filing

176/209

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$11,910,514Human Services$3,441,143Health$2,430,649Community Improvement$980,600Arts & Culture$933,943Education$741,640Philanthropy$448,180

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA147.9× affinity137 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · The United Way of Southwestern · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Fisa Foundation · Upmc Group · Opportunity Foundation · Poise Foundation · The Fine Foundation · The Buhl Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STAUNTON FARM FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEETOTAL INITIATIVE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 922598443 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TEETOTAL INITIATIVE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 54% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Staunton Farm Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Staunton Farm Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STAUNTON FARM FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

209 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Staunton Farm Foundation?

More from the funding graph

STAUNTON FARM FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

209 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Staunton Farm Foundation?

More from the funding graph