How much did STANLEY & DOROTHY FRANK FAMILY grant in FY2024?

Education$958kCommunity Improvement$738kHuman Services$675kPhilanthropy$390kHealth$215kArts & Culture$57kYouth Development$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kInternational$16kOther$1.3M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

educational

2019

—

2020

legaljewisheducationoffersprofessionallutheran churcheducational

2021

jewishmakeeducationprofessionallutheranchurchoffers

2022

musicjewishyoungmakeeducationadvancementoffers

2023

musicjewishmakeyoungeducationlutheranchurch

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $28k
$10k–50k10 grants · $227k
$50k–250k7 grants · $699k

$27,639

Median grant

States reached

$38M

Total assets

Largest grants

WELL-SPRING SOLUTIONS$150,000
GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$125,000
APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY$110,557
THE NUSSBAUM CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC$100,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO$75,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL$73,904
GUILFORD COLLEGE$64,216
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$42,811
ACTION GREENSBORO INC$40,000
LUTHERAN CHAPEL CHURCH$27,639
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$27,639
CONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPY$25,000
GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION$15,713
AUTHORACARE COLLECTIVE$14,756
EBENEZER LUTHERAN CHURCH$12,883

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $624k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.2M · 25 repeat orgs$286k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.2M

$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

-16%

Still filing today

72%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TN
THE NUSSBAUM CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $555k · revenue +635% · 28% of their budget
WS
WELL-SPRING SOLUTIONS
3× · 2022–2024 · $450k · revenue +30%
GT
GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $361k · revenue +129%

Funded once

AC
ADULT CENTER FOR ENRICHMENT INC
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -16%
GP
GREENSBORO POLICE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +42%
DG
DOWNTOWN GREENSBRO FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +145%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Greensboro Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

To serve as greensboro, north carolina's principal economic and community development organization. our goal is to strategically develop a vibrant community that creates, expands, and attracts business while advancing the quality of life…

—

Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education

Greensboro College

An academic and social community that unites the liberal arts and Judeo-Christian values.

Education

Foundation for a Greater Greenwood

Providing leadership to enhance the quality of life in greenwood through strategic long-term vision and collaborative community development initiatives.

Philanthropy

Greensboro College Foundation

Greensboro college foundation was formed to support the exempt purposes of greensboro college.

Education

Greater Winston-Salem

To facilitate growth and economic diversification in winston-salem and forsyth county.

Community Improvement

Greenville Area Development

Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county, south carolina. gadc was formed by greenville county council.

Community Improvement

Downtown Greensboro Inc

Promote and stimulate new investment, interest and economic development in the center city area of greensboro, north carolina.

—

The Natural Science Center of Greensboro

The mission of the center is inspiring curiosity and connecting communities through science and conservation. we accomplish this by providing ever-evolving experiences where exploration and imagination intersect, igniting a lifelong…

Arts & Culture

Greater Concord Chamber of Commerce

The organization merges the talents, skills and resources of the area business community for the purpose of developing economic opportunities, strengthening the business climate and enhancing the quality of life for its membership.

—

North Carolina State University

Supports, by financial assistance and otherwise, the various colleges within the university, the libraries, and other university-connected functions.

Education

Gardner-Webb University

Gardner-webb university, a private, christian, baptist-related university, provides outstanding undergraduate and graduate education that is strongly grounded in the liberal arts while offering opportunities to prepare for various…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/34

the rest of the field

14%

442/3,071

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/27

Grantees still filing

18/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,404,098Education$958,199Community Improvement$737,500Human Services$675,310Philanthropy$390,308Health$215,000Arts & Culture$56,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of GreaterNC49.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater · Greensboro Jewish Federation · Well-Spring Retirement Community Inc · Tannenbaum-Sternberger Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Greensboro Inc · The Cemala Foundation Inc · Jewish Foundation of Greensboro · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Moses Cone - Wesley Long Community · Hillsdale Fund · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Bell Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STANLEY & DOROTHY FRANK FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE NUSSBAUM CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 561577495 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE NUSSBAUM CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stanley & Dorothy Frank Family?

Find your warmest path to Stanley & Dorothy Frank Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STANLEY & DOROTHY FRANK FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stanley & Dorothy Frank Family?

More from the funding graph

STANLEY & DOROTHY FRANK FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stanley & Dorothy Frank Family?

More from the funding graph