Skip to content
Stand Up for Pits Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Stand Up for Pits Foundation Inc

Sufp foundation's mission includes educating the public about untrue, negative stereotypes about pit bull type dogs (aka 'pibbles') because these misunderstandings foster fear, hate, and ignorance that results in human violence against animals.

$309k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Animals$393k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $129,555, the rows itemized in this filing. The $309,076 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $179,521 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
$8,343
Median grant
9
States reached
$818k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMNER NEUTER ALLIANCE$26,062
SPAYNATION$19,012
GRANTS LESS THAN 5K$16,599
ANIMALS R FAMILY$16,273
FIX-A-BULL$9,031
ILLIAMS RESCUE DBA ARKANSAS SPAY & NEUTER LOTTERY$8,343
BARK NATION$8,199
HELLO PITTIE$7,470
ANIMAL FIX CLINIC$6,505
SPEAK FOR ANIMALS$6,469
TLC PETSNIP$5,592
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MOBILE ANIMAL SURGICAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%ANIMAL FIX CLINIC: $7k → 9%GRANTS LESS THAN 5K: $17k → 14%BUSTER'S PAWS: $7k → 15%ALAMO CITY PIT BULL: $5k → 16%GREENVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $6k → 10%ILLIAMS RESCUE DBA ARKANSAS SPAY & NEUTER LOTTERY: $8k → 15%TLC PETSNIP: $6k → 16%BARK NATION: $28k → 8%ANIMALS R FAMILY: $16k → 9%POA SPAY: $7k → 11%SUMNER NEUTER ALLIANCE: $26k → 8%SPAY CAMPBELL COUNTRY TENNESSEE PETS (SPAYCC): $5k → 20%ETC GEORGIA: $10k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF ELKHART COUNTRY: $8k → 13%HELLO PITTIE: $7k → 9%SPAYNATION: $19k → 17%REAL GOOD RESCUE: $6k → 14%SPEAK FOR ANIMALS: $8k → 10%BARK NATION: $8k → 8%SUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE: $23k → 8%SPAY NATION: $10k → 17%UNDERDOG HEROES INC: $21k → 14%SPEAK FOR ANIMALS: $6k → 10%BARK NATION: $6k → 8%SUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE: $13k → 8%WILD CAT FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%SPAYNATION FOR DOGS AND CATS: $9k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
IN
CT
CA
AZ
AR
TN
SC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 6 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$235k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+35%

Still filing today

83%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $62k · revenue +27%
  • OL
    ONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +15%
  • WC
    WILD CAT FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $48k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UH
    Underdog Heroes Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue -45%
  • SO
    SPCA of North Brevard Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -66%
  • EG
    ETC GEORGIA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

Animals
2
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
3
Claws and Paws for a Cause

For our community we provide high quality low cost spay and neuter services as well as low cost vaccinations. we do have programs that allows us to help the families that have pets but are in financial strain and not able to have their…

Religion
4
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
5
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
6
Operation Pawpulation

The mission of Operation Pawpulation is to offer support and resources, including low-cost and no-cost spay/neuter, vaccinations and microchips in order to save lives by reducing the number of homeless pets in our community. Spaying and…

Animals
7
Carolina Animal Network

we are a small animal rescue. We help the community by assisting with vet care and rehoming animals they cannot keep. We also pull dogs cats kittens and puppies from local kill shelters when they run out of space, we provide those animals…

Animals
8
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
9
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
10
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
11
Lucky Pup Rescue

Our nonprofit organization specializes in the rescue and adoption of dogs in need. We provide shelter medical care and love to abandoned and abused dogs helping them find forever homes. Through community outreach and adoption events we…

Animals
12
Free State Four Paws Inc

Free State Four Paws Inc. is a shelter-less animal rescue providing rescue for stray and abandoned animals including all vet and care expenses until they can be placed in permanent homes. Our mission is to reduce the overpopulation abuse…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The South Carolina Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Spay Campbell County Tennessee Pets. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE: $61,597 · AnimalsSUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCEONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION: $50,172 · AnimalsONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATIONWILD CAT FOUNDATION INC: $48,374 · AnimalsWILD CAT FOUNDATION INCBARK NATION: $41,607 · AnimalsBARK NATIONUnderdog Heroes Inc: $20,634 · AnimalsUnderdog Heroes IncOUT OF THE PITS INC: $19,486 · AnimalsOUT OF THE PITS INCSTAND UP FOR PITS FOUNDATION INC: $16,599 · AnimalsSPEAK FOR ANIMALS: $14,146 · AnimalsSPCA of North Brevard Inc: $12,000 · Animals+8 more: $56,205 · Animals+8 moreANIMALSRFAMILY INC: $16,273 · OtherANIMALSRFAMILY …MOST VALUABLE PETS MVP INC: $10,257 · OtherMOST VALUABLE P…ILLIAMS RESCUE DBA ARKANSAS SPAY & NEUTER LOTTERY: $8,343 · OtherILLIAMS RESCUE …BUSTERS PAW PRINTS: $6,710 · OtherBUSTERS PAW PRI…REAL GOOD RESCUE INC: $5,500 · OtherREAL GOOD RESCU…ALAMO CITY PIT BULL RESCUE AND REHA BILITATION: $5,000 · OtherALAMO CITY PIT …
Animals$340,820Other$52,083

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE: $61,597 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION: $50,172 over 2y, 12% of budgetWILD CAT FOUNDATION INC: $48,374 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBARK NATION: $41,607 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetUnderdog Heroes Inc: $20,634 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetOUT OF THE PITS INC: $19,486 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSTAND UP FOR PITS FOUNDATION INC: $16,599 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSPEAK FOR ANIMALS: $14,146 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSPCA of North Brevard Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetETC GEORGIA INC: $10,476 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ELKHART COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROTECTORS OF ANIMALS INC: $7,225 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFIX OUR FERALS: $6,505 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,199 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTLC PETSNIP INC: $5,592 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREAL GOOD RESCUE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSPAY CAMPBELL COUNTY TENNESSEE PETS: $5,238 over 1y, 9.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duffield Family F…Petco LoveBISSELL Pet FoundationPetsmart Charities IncThe American Society …Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's FundCA21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petco Love · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stand Up for Pits Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stand Up for Pits Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Tlc Petsnip Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stand Up for Pits’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home