How much did STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC grant in FY2024?

STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC reported 9 grants totaling $149,915,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC based?

STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC is based in VA.

STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC

Stand together advances its members' common interests and the interests of all people by promoting a society of mutual benefit, where (continued on schedule o)

$150M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$121M

Largest

01What you fund

0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$501MEnvironment$3.0MEducation$1.5MPublic Benefit$1.1MCivil Rights$643kYouth Development$362kEmployment$355kHuman Services$282kCrime & Legal$200kOther$96M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

george bushpresidentlibrary museumpoliticscontentcorporationeducational

2021

millerurbanscholarsprincipleslibertyemploymenttools

2022

technologycongressionaltechfreedompolicymakersenhancespufpcareer

2023

groupsfree marketscapitalbettersharerealbuilding

2024

sufferingdialogueglobalsocialchangeactioncreate

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$50k–250k5 grants · $450k
$250k+4 grants · $149M

$150,000

Median grant

States reached

$257M

Total assets

Largest grants

Americans for Prosperity$121,000,000
Americans for Prosperity Action$22,800,000
Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream LLC$5,000,000
Arena Hall$250,000
Beast Philanthropy$150,000
The Aspen Institute$100,000
Global Impact - GG$75,000
Global Impact Initative$75,000
SHRM Foundation Inc$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $282k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$588M · 7 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +289% since the first grant, against +74% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$588M

$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+289%

+74%

Still filing today

86%

81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.7M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
Americans for Prosperity
6× · 2017–2024 · $501M · revenue +289% · 90% of their budget
YE
Yes Every Kid Inc
3× · 2020–2022 · $9.3M · revenue +356% · 99% of their budget
PI
Populace Inc
2× · 2020–2021 · $3.0M · revenue +1% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

MC
Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream LLC
one grant, 2023 · $5.0M
TL
The LeBron James Family Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $575k · revenue +73%
SB
SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST INCgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +228%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Contemporary Policy Institute

Philanthropy

Competitive Enterprise Institute

Public policy research/education dedicated to principles of free enterprise & limited government.

—

Technology Policy Institute

International

International Peace Institute Inc

The international peace institute is an independent, non-profit organization working to strengthen inclusive multilateralism for a more peaceful and sustainable planet. through its research, convening, and strategic advising, ipi provides…

International

Hudson Institute Inc

Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic…

—

Responsible Innovation Labs Inc

Responsible Innovation Labs is a coalition of leading investors and technology executives who recognize the importance of responsible innovation and the need for a more rigorous approach to tackling the challenges and opportunities of this…

Science & Tech

American Enterprise Institute for Public

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science

International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion

Foreign Policy Research Institute

Highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on u.s. foreign policy

International

Polis Institute Inc

Polis Institute is dedicated to creating a better world by providing the tools and strategies that bring immediate and lasting change to those most affected by social inequities. We believe in challenging the status quo through empowering…

Religion

Quincy Institute for Responsible

The quincy institute promotes ideas that move u.s. foreign policy away from endless war and toward vigorous diplomacy in the pursuit of international peace. our vision is a world where peace is the norm and war the exception.

Community Improvement

Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fii - National and the most unlike its peers is Global Impact. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/51

the rest of the field

11%

5,477/50,417

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/46

Grantees still filing

39/46

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Community Improvement$500,500,000Other$96,357,517Environment$3,000,000Education$1,523,231Public Benefit$1,135,000Civil Rights$643,329Youth Development$362,157

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Koch InstituteVA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Koch Institute · Stand Together Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Stand Together C4 Fund · John William Pope Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · New Venture Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Yes Every Kid Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833028208 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Yes Every Kid Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 99% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stand Together Chamber of Commerce Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stand Together Chamber of Commerce Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stand Together Chamber of Commerce Inc?

More from the funding graph

STAND TOGETHER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stand Together Chamber of Commerce Inc?

More from the funding graph