Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stan Fried Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$373kEducation$201kHuman Services$22kHealth$7kEnvironment$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$2k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,200
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 94% of reported assets are held in Common Stock Rbc 4210.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE$6,451
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE$6,451
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$6,451
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION WIMU FUND$6,450
OLD DOMINION GREYHOUND ADOPTION$6,201
GREYT LOVE RETIREMENT$6,201
GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC$6,200
LINDA ANN'S GREYHOUND ADOPTION$6,200
PIERPONT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM$5,500
NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$5,500
ELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS$5,000
PEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY$802
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $2k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $3k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MT
PA
CA
CO
WV
VA
AR
NC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$573k · 26 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$573k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-5%

Still filing today

46%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Montana State University Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +315%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $44k · revenue +196%
  • EG
    ELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • DC
    DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • PC
    PIERPORT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greyhound Pet Adoption Fl Se Inc

Place retired racing greyhounds in homes

—
2
Fast Friends Greyhound Adoption in
—
3
Carolina Greys Greyhound Adoption Inc

Dog adoption

Animals
4
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
5
Golden State Greyhound Adoption

Greyhound adoption

Animals
6
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
7
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
8
Friends of Retired Greyhounds
Animals
9
Valley of the Sun Dog Rescue

Rescue Dogs and place them in safe homes

Animals
10
Florida Giant Dog Rescue Inc

Rescue rehome large breed dogs

Animals
11
Last Day Dog Rescue Inc

LDDR is a 501(c)(3) organization with a simple mission - saving animals. To us, Last Day is more than just a name; it is a situation that all of our animals are faced with. We are a no-kill animal rescue based in Livonia, Michigan, with…

Animals
12
Dog Squad

Finding adoptive homes for abandoned dogs.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Henrys Fork Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE: $36,825 · OtherPEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUEWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $34,648 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF VETER…OLD DOMINION GREYHOUND ADOPTION: $32,000 · OtherOLD DOMINION GREYHOUND ADOPTIONPIERPONT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM: $27,500 · OtherPIERPONT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE VETERINARY TEC…Individual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY: $21,000 · OtherEDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH COUNTYGREYT LOVE RETIREMENT: $19,951 · OtherGREYT LOVE RETIREMENTLINDA ANNS GREYHOUND ADOPTION INC: $16,999 · OtherLINDA ANNS GREYHOUND ADOPTION INCPIERPORT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM: $16,000 · OtherGREYHOUND ADOPTIONS OF FLORIDA: $13,453 · OtherFRIENDS OF GREYHOUNDS INC: $13,190 · Other+11 more: $47,221 · Other+11 moreCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $56,567 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUND…Montana State University Foundation Inc: $50,171 · EducationMontana State University Founda…NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $43,500 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDIC…THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,686 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUND…ELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS INC: $36,000 · AnimalsELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTION…GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $29,249 · AnimalsGREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NOR…BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $26,080 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INCTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,824 · AnimalsTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIET…FastFriends Greyhound Adoption of California Inc: $8,222 · AnimalsFastFriends Greyhound Ad…VIRGINIA GREYHOUND ADOPTION: $7,400 · AnimalsVIRGINIA GREYHOUND ADOPT…THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY: $6,893 · AnimalsPalm Beach Foster Dog Project Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $2,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Health
Other$301,287Education$170,924Animals$130,668Human Services$6,500Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $56,567 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $50,171 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC: $43,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS INC: $36,000 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetGREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $29,249 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $26,080 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,686 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,824 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFastFriends Greyhound Adoption of California Inc: $8,222 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetVIRGINIA GREYHOUND ADOPTION: $7,400 over 3y, 24% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY: $6,893 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPalm Beach Foster Dog Project Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FastFriends Greyhound Adoption of California Inc ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GREYHOUND ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Palm Beach Foster Dog Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stan Fried Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stan Fried Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stan Fried Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stan Fried Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stan Fried Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph