· Private foundation
Stan Fried Private Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Anchored by a single position — about 94% of reported assets are held in Common Stock Rbc 4210.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE | $6,451 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE | $6,451 |
| COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $6,451 |
| MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION WIMU FUND | $6,450 |
| OLD DOMINION GREYHOUND ADOPTION | $6,201 |
| GREYT LOVE RETIREMENT | $6,201 |
| GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC | $6,200 |
| LINDA ANN'S GREYHOUND ADOPTION | $6,200 |
| PIERPONT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE VETERINARY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | $5,500 |
| NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $5,500 |
| PEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY | $802 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMontana State University Foundation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +315%
- NCNORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $44k · revenue +196%
- EGELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- DCDUKE CANCER INSTITUTE OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2022 · $7k
- PCPIERPORT COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $6k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIAone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Place retired racing greyhounds in homes
Dog adoption
Greyhound adoption
Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.
Rescue Dogs and place them in safe homes
Rescue rehome large breed dogs
LDDR is a 501(c)(3) organization with a simple mission - saving animals. To us, Last Day is more than just a name; it is a situation that all of our animals are faced with. We are a no-kill animal rescue based in Livonia, Michigan, with…
Finding adoptive homes for abandoned dogs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henrys Fork Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELITE GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds GREYHOUND FRIENDS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FastFriends Greyhound Adoption of California Inc ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA GREYHOUND ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOUDOUN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach Foster Dog Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stan Fried Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stan Fried Private Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Stan Fried Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.