· Private foundation
Stake Club Charitable Foundation Incorporated
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of STAKE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $52,000 |
| GOLF FORE AFRICA | $13,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND | $13,000 |
| THE PATRIOT FUND | $13,000 |
| HAVEN HOMES | $9,543 |
| WATERSPRINGS RANCH | $9,543 |
| PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL | $6,022 |
| FIRST TEE - GREATER PHILADELPHIA | $5,943 |
| GALLAGHER FOUNDATION LLC | $4,071 |
| THE PATRIOT FUND | $3,942 |
| WINTERS CENTER FOR AUTISM | $3,623 |
| MERCY HOUSE GLOBAL | $3,302 |
| FIRST TEE - GREATER PHILADELPHIA | $3,223 |
| THE NATIONAL MS SOCIETY | $3,062 |
| PINE CREST SCHOOL ATTENTION BRANDY MILLER OFFICE OF PHILANTHROPIC ENGAGEM | $2,422 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPATRIOT FUND INC3× · 2022–2024 · $70k · revenue +51%
- TFTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $14k · revenue +990%
- TSTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- DMDec My Room Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +35%
- TRTHE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +41%
- FTFIRST TEE OF CHARLESTONone grant, 2023 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To positvely impact the lives of young people, including those with special needs and veterans by providing educational programs that build character, instill life enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.
American Golf Foundation is dedicated to the enhancement and enrichment of communities by promoting the enjoyment of the game of golf and its ideals through charity, education and community service.
Golf fights cancer (gfc) taps into the passion and generosity of all golfers to raise much needed funds for cancer related organizations and families living with the disease. specifically, gfc makes targeted donations for equipment,…
Pines of sarasota foundation secures funding to provide compassionate care, vital resources, and financial assistance for the seniors, children, and the nursing community serving them.
To impact the lives of young people throughout connecticut by providing educational programs that build character, instill life-enhancing values and promote healthy choices through the game of golf.
To support wounded veterans, individuals with intellectual disabilities, and disadvantaged youth through golf; and to provide a platform for west point to showcase its golf program
Golf for special needs children, inc. is an organization that seeks to help special needs children and their families cope with expenses they may incur. golf for special needs children, inc. will fulfill its mission and purpose by planning…
The physical therapy fund provides research and educational support for physical therapy.
To impact the lives of young people by providing educational programs that build character and instill life-enhancing values through the game of golf. first tee enables kids to build the strength of character that empowers them through a…
To foster national or international amateur golf competition.
To improve the quality of life for families challenged by alzheimer's disease or another dementia, through services tailored to meet individual needs.
We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is Patriot Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 34% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PATRIOT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds Dec My Room Inc ↗
- Who funds WATERSPRINGS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PACIFICA CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MERCY MATERNITY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WINTERS CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds THE PETER FRATES FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN YOUTH CAMP ↗
- Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
- Who funds OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Seal Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MEADOW CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARLESTON DAY SCHOOLINC ↗
- Who funds MOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC ↗
- Who funds PECONIC HOCKEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Equitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Greater Houston Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stake Club Charitable Foundation Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stake Club Charitable Foundation Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Stake Club Charitable Foundation Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.