Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$87kReligion$38kCrime & Legal$33kInternational$20k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$390k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Albania Crossroads Bible School$9,500
Global Scholars$6,500
Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat$6,000
Defenders of Media$5,000
CRU$3,500
Living Hope International$3,000
Leadline Ministries$1,650
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 63% of grant dollars ($111k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 37% that went abroad ($66k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Loving Life Inc: $2k → 11%Real Truth Matters: $10k → 8%Discipleship Unlimited: $3k → 12%Bodenshof Bible School: $2k → 23%CRU: $4k → 13%Every Heart: $2k → 11%Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat: $8k → 5%Living Hope International: $5k → 6%Ravencrest Bible School: $7k → 11%College Park UB Church Adora Christ: $4k → 13%Defenders of Media: $5k → 7%Leadline Ministries: $2k → 11%Real Truth Matters: $4k → 8%Discipleship Unlimited: $500 → 12%Bodenshof Bible School: $2k → 23%Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat: $8k → 5%Living Hope International: $5k → 6%College Park UB Church Adora Christ: $3k → 13%Defenders of Media: $5k → 7%Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat: $8k → 5%Living Hope International: $4k → 6%College Park UB Church Adora Christ: $1k → 13%Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat: $6k → 5%Living Hope International: $3k → 6%Living Hope International: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
IN
CO
MD
KS
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 37% of all-years giving ($66k)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$27k · 4 grants
OC$15k · 3 grants
Albania$10k · 1 grant
Sweden$8k · 1 grant
Germany$4k · 2 grants
Austria$2k · 1 grant
United Arab Emirates$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 10 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$130k
$32k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat
    4× · 2018–2025 · $30k
  • LH
    LIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue +19%
  • CH
    Capernwray Harbour Bible Center
    3× · 2017–2022 · $15k

Funded once

  • CH
    Capernwray Harbour Bible Centre
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • RB
    Ravencrest Bible School
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wisconsin Inmate Education Associat: $29,500 · OtherWisconsin Inmate Education AssociatCapernwray Harbour Bible Center: $15,443 · OtherCapernwray Harbour Bible CenterIndividual grant recipient: $14,970 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $13,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGLOBAL SCHOLARS: $11,500 · OtherGLOBAL SCHOLARSCapernwray Harbour Bible Centre: $11,386 · OtherCapernwray Harbour Bible CentreAlbania Crossroads Bible School: $9,500 · OtherAlbania Crossroads Bible SchoolCollege Park UB Church Adora Christ: $8,000 · OtherCollege Park UB Church Adora ChristIndividual grant recipient: $7,875 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRavencrest Bible School: $7,000 · Other+7 more: $15,822 · Other+7 moreLIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $19,700 · Housing & ShelterLIVING HOPE …DEFENDERS MEDIA: $10,000 · ReligionDISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC: $3,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$144,496Housing & Shelter$19,700Religion$10,000Crime & Legal$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $19,700 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL SCHOLARS: $11,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDEFENDERS MEDIA: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVING HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDERS MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds DISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stacey Elizabeth Mayer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stacey Elizabeth Mayer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph