Skip to content
St Mary Medical Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St Mary Medical Center Inc

St.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.0MCommunity Improvement$45kRecreation & Sports$45kYouth Development$11kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $100,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $126,583 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,783 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$100,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$230M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC$100,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $922k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YMCA of Valparaiso Indiana Inc: $122k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $115k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $106k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $105k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $105k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $105k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $101k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $83k → 9%YMCA of Valparaiso Indiana Inc: $81k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+116%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VY
    VALPARAISO YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $922k · revenue +12%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTAGE TOWNSHIP INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $57k · revenue +44%
  • HF
    Hobart Family YMCA Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $57k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • BS
    Brickie Sports Booster Ltd
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • VP
    VALPARAISO PARKS DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • VC
    VALPARAISO COMMUNITY FESTIVALS AND EVENTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +116%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
2
Lake County Young Men's Christian Association

The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
3
Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association Inc

The wabash county ymca is a charitable nonprofit human service organization that includes children, teens, women and men, and does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, or national origin. the mission of the wabash ymca is…

—
4
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)

Guided by our christian principles, we strengthen the spirit mind and body of all individuals.

Human Services
5
Young Men's Christian Association of Pierce and Kitsap Counties

The mission of the YMCA is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. We are an inclusive organization, serving all people regardless of background, religion, beliefs,…

Human Services
6
Henry County Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

—
7
Young Mens Christian Association Findlay Ohio

Mission and delivering our cause: the ymca mission is to put christian principles into practice that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the ymca is a diverse organization of men, women and children joined together by a shared…

Human Services
8
Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce Inc

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—
9
Grand Traverse Bay Ymca

To put judeo-christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

—
10
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
11
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the strategic plan is to position lancaster county businesses to thrive. by…

—
12
Young Men's Christian Association of Grant County Inc

The ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Portage Township Inc; the most unlike its peers is City of Gary Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALPARAISO YMCA: $921,680 · Human ServicesVALPARAISO YMCAYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTAGE TOWNSHIP INC: $56,530 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…Hobart Family YMCA Inc: $56,500 · OtherHobart Family YMCA I…Brickie Sports Booster Ltd: $38,161 · OtherBrickie Sports Boost…GREATER VALPARAISO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $32,974 · OtherGREATER VALPARAISO C…PORTAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 · OtherPORTAGE ECONOMIC DEV…+2 more: $12,100 · Other+2 moreUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $5,164 · Philanthropy
Human Services$921,680Other$208,265Philanthropy$5,164

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALPARAISO YMCA: $921,680 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTAGE TOWNSHIP INC: $56,530 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetHobart Family YMCA Inc: $56,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER VALPARAISO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $32,974 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPORTAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetVALPARAISO COMMUNITY FESTIVALS AND EVENT: $5,600 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Porter County Communi…John W Anderson Found…Early Learning Indian…Nisource Charitable F…Amazonsmile Foundation
Porter County Community Foundation IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Porter County Community Foundation Inc · John W Anderson Foundation · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Mary Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Mary Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Mary Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home