Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

St Mary Medical Center Inc

St.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$1.0MCommunity Improvement$45kRecreation & Sports$45kYouth Development$11kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $100,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $126,583 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,783 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$100,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$230M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC$100,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $922k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YMCA of Valparaiso Indiana Inc: $122k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $115k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $106k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $105k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $105k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $105k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $101k → 9%YMCA OF VALPARAISO INDIANA INC: $83k → 9%YMCA of Valparaiso Indiana Inc: $81k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+109%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VY
    VALPARAISO YMCA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $922k · revenue +12%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTAGE TOWNSHIP INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $57k · revenue +44%
  • HF
    Hobart Family YMCA Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $57k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • BS
    Brickie Sports Booster Ltd
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • VP
    VALPARAISO PARKS DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • VC
    VALPARAISO COMMUNITY FESTIVALS AND EVENTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +109%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
2
Young Men's Christian Association of Pierce and Kitsap Counties

The mission of the YMCA is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. We are an inclusive organization, serving all people regardless of background, religion, beliefs,…

Human Services
3
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)

Guided by our christian principles, we strengthen the spirit mind and body of all individuals.

Human Services
4
Lake County Young Men's Christian Association

The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
5
Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association Inc

The wabash county ymca is a charitable nonprofit human service organization that includes children, teens, women and men, and does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, or national origin. the mission of the wabash ymca is…

6
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
7
Grand Traverse Bay Ymca

To put judeo-christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

8
Henry County Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

9
Young Mens Christian Association Findlay Ohio

Mission and delivering our cause: the ymca mission is to put christian principles into practice that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the ymca is a diverse organization of men, women and children joined together by a shared…

Human Services
10
Young Men's Christian Association of Grant County Inc

The ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
11
Valdosta-Lowndes County Family Ymca (1456)

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all

Human Services
12
The Young Mens Christian Association of the Chippewa Valley

Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Portage Township Inc and the most unlike its peers is City of Gary Economic Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALPARAISO YMCA — $921,680 · Human ServicesVALPARAISO YMCAYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTAGE TOWNSHIP INC — $56,530 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…Hobart Family YMCA Inc — $56,500 · OtherHobart Family YMCA I…Brickie Sports Booster Ltd — $38,161 · OtherBrickie Sports Boost…GREATER VALPARAISO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $32,974 · OtherGREATER VALPARAISO C…PORTAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,000 · OtherPORTAGE ECONOMIC DEV…+2 more — $12,100 · Other+2 moreUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $5,164 · Philanthropy
Human Services$921,680Other$208,265Philanthropy$5,164

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALPARAISO YMCA — $921,680 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTAGE TOWNSHIP INC — $56,530 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetHobart Family YMCA Inc — $56,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGREATER VALPARAISO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $32,974 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPORTAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetVALPARAISO COMMUNITY FESTIVALS AND EVENT — $5,600 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Porter County Community Foundation IncIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Porter County Community Foundation Inc · John W Anderson Foundation · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Mary Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph