Skip to content

· Public charity

St Luke's Cornwall Hospital

Montefiore st.

$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$4.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$27MCommunity Improvement$116kPhilanthropy$38kEducation$22kReligion$7kYouth Development$6kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
  • $250k+2 grants · $6.3M
$11,650
Median grant
—
States reached
$177M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hudson Vista Medical PC$4,390,529
Hudson Vista Physician Services PC$1,898,794
The Chamber of Commerce of Orange County Inc$21,290
Orange County Partnership Inc$11,650
Access Supports for Living Foundation Inc$6,150
Cornerstone Family Healthcare$5,900
The Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Hospice of Orange & Sullivan Counties: $5k → 14%Cancer Resource Center of the Hudson Valley: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 11 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$27M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-2%

Still filing today

91%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HV
    Hudson Vista Medical PC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16M · revenue +243% · 38% of their budget
  • HV
    Hudson Vista Physician Services PC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +11% · 28% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $83k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • MP
    MID-HUDSON PATTERN FOR PROGRESSINC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -2%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +26%
  • TN
    THE NEWBURGH MINISTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
2
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
5
Mount Nittany Health System

To provide management and administrative services to all mount nittany health susidiaries.

Health
6
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
White Plains Hospital Medical Center

White plains hospital (wph) is a voluntary, not-for-profit health care organization with the primary mission of offering high quality, acute health care and preventive medical care to all people who live in, work in, or visit westchester…

Health
11
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
12
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hudson Vista Medical PC: $15,663,200 · HealthHudson Vista Medical PCHudson Vista Physician Services PC: $11,482,009 · HealthHudson Vista Physician Services PC+7 more: $176,050 · HealthTHE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $83,390 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $32,650 · OtherMount Saint Mary College: $14,125 · OtherMID-HUDSON PATTERN FOR PROGRESSINC: $7,560 · OtherTHE NEWBURGH MINISTRY INC: $6,500 · OtherHudson Valley Council Inc: $6,430 · OtherACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING FOUNDATION INC: $32,450 · PhilanthropyVISION HUDSON VALLEY: $5,600 · PhilanthropyCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF ORANGE AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES INC: $5,250 · Human ServicesNEWBURGH ARMORY UNITY CENTER INC: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$27,321,259Community Improvement$83,390Other$67,265Philanthropy$38,050Human Services$10,750Recreation & Sports$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHudson Vista Medical PC: $15,663,200 over 8y, 38% of budgetHudson Vista Physician Services PC: $11,482,009 over 8y, 28% of budgetTHE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $83,390 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $65,825 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $32,775 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $32,650 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING FOUNDATION INC: $32,450 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital: $10,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMID-HUDSON PATTERN FOR PROGRESSINC: $7,560 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBURGH MINISTRY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHudson Valley Council Inc: $6,430 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMontefiore Nyack Hospital Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVISION HUDSON VALLEY: $5,600 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEWBURGH ARMORY UNITY CENTER INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF ORANGE AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William and Elaine Kaplan Family Private FoundationNY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William and Elaine Kaplan Family Private Foundation · Community Foundation of Orange and Sulli · Montefiore Medical Center · Warwick Savings Foundation · Mutual of America Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Luke's Cornwall Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Luke's Cornwall Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Luke's Cornwall Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph