Skip to content
St John's Health Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St John's Health Foundation

To secure philanthropic support and provide advocacy to advance the mission and strategic objectives of st.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$36MHousing & Shelter$825kHuman Services$271kArts & Culture$48kEducation$42kPhilanthropy$7kEnvironment$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $3,169,987, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,738,970 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $568,983 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.1M
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TETON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT DBA SJMC$3,110,059
SAGE LIVING$30,000
ST JOHN'S COMUNITY HEALTH$18,681
JACKSON HOLE PUBLIC ART$11,247
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Flourish Foundation: $11k → 7%Flourish Foundation: $6k → 7%Flourish Foundation: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 6 repeat orgs$879k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$36M
$830k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Jackson Hole Public Art
    4× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +21%
  • EF
    EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $42k · revenue +40%
  • FF
    FLOURISH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • JH
    JACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $825k · revenue -93%
  • AP
    Astoria Park Conservancy
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jackson Hole Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county

—
2
Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance

The mission of the jackson hole conservation alliance is to protect the wildlife, wild places and community character of jackson hole.

Environment
3
Jackson Hole Community School

JHCS prepares students to succeed in college and life through challenging academics and excellence in teaching, in a community founded on personal relationships, student initiative, and integrity.

Education
4
Jackson Hole Land Trust

The jackson hole land trust (jhlt) is a nonprofit that was established in 1980. the land trust's mission is to protect and steward northwest wyoming landscapes for current and future generations. the land trust envisions a legacy of…

Environment
5
The Jackson Hole Technology Partnership

To fuel local, regional and global tech ecosystems to shape a better future.

Science & Tech
6
Walk Family Jackson Hole Housing Fund
Arts & Culture
7
Rendezvous Lands Conservancy

To improve the quality of life in rural intermountain west communities by protecting, owning, and creating locally significant keystone conservation properties as public access parks.

Environment
8
St John's Health Foundation

To secure philanthropic support and provide advocacy to advance the mission and strategic objectives of st. john's health providing our unique community and visitors with exceptional and ever-advancing healthcare.

Health
9
Johnston Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Johnston health foundation seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people in our communities by supporting the patients, programs, and services of unc health johnston. the foundation seeks to be a philanthropic leader and…

—
10
Jefferson National Parks Association

Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.

Arts & Culture
11
Jackson Hole Community Radio Inc

Our mission is to serve the jackson hole community of residents and visitors through independent local and regional news by creating a forum for the free exchange of ideas and music discovery that informs, entertains, and promotes a deeper…

Arts & Culture
12
Jackson Community Development Corp

Our vision is to seek the wholistic wellbeing of the Jackson neighborhood, where residents are known, valued, and empowered to collaborate for the thriving of its people and place.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole; the most unlike its peers is Jackson Hole Public Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TETON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $35,862,532 · OtherTETON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT+4 more: $1,074,614 · OtherEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $42,000 · PhilanthropyST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $18,681 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $7,000 · PhilanthropyJackson Hole Public Art: $48,167 · Arts & CultureFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC: $21,787 · Human ServicesAstoria Park Conservancy: $5,000 · Environment
Other$36,937,146Philanthropy$67,681Arts & Culture$48,167Human Services$21,787Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST: $825,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetJackson Hole Public Art: $48,167 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $42,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC: $21,787 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $18,681 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CENTER OF JACKSON HOLE INC: $11,828 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAstoria Park Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …First Interstate Banc…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St John's Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St John's Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St John's Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home