Skip to content
Ssm Regional Health Services at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Ssm Regional Health Services

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

$286k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$299kHuman Services$195kReligion$134kHealth$132kRecreation & Sports$58kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $155,692, the rows itemized in this filing. The $285,960 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $130,268 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$30,265
Median grant
1
States reached
$70M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN UNIVERSITY$60,407
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN MISSOURI$37,500
JEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB$30,265
ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF JEFFERSON CITY$16,000
EL PUENTE HISPANIC MINISTRY$11,520
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Lincoln University: $61k → 10%St Mary's Jeff City Foundation: $115k → 11%Northwest Foundation Inc: $52k → 17%LINCOLN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 10%Northwest Foundation Inc: $50k → 17%LINCOLN UNIVERSITY: $60k → 10%Lincoln University: $15k → 10%YMCA of Jefferson County: $10k → 10%JEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB: $30k → 10%JEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB: $17k → 10%Catholic Diocese of Jefferson City: $12k → 10%EL PUENTE HISPANIC MINISTRY: $12k → 10%JEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB: $11k → 10%St Mary's Health Center Jefferson City MO Foundation: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$807k · 7 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$807k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+133%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri
    4× · 2021–2024 · $185k · revenue +68%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HEALTH CENTER JEFFERSON CITY MO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $121k · revenue +79%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB
    3× · 2022–2024 · $58k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEFFERSON CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +133%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jefferson Chamber of Commerce

To work for the advancement of the business community, to enhance the economic, civic and cultural environment, and to improve the quality of life in jefferson parish, louisiana.

—
2
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
3
St Joseph's Hospital & Health Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
4
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
5
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
6
Madison St Joseph Health Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
7
St Joseph's Area Health Services

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
8
Ssm Regional Health Services

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
9
St Mary's Hospital Centralia Illinois

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
10
Jefferson Center for Mental Health

To inspire hope, improve lives and strengthen our community by providing mental health and related solutions for individuals and families.

Health
11
Burleson St Joseph Manor

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
12
Mercy Medical Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Health Center Jefferson City Mo Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Benevolent Healthcare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINCOLN UNIVERSITY: $197,118 · OtherLINCOLN UNIVERSITYCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF JEFFERSON CITY: $122,825 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF JEFFERSON CITYST MARY'S HEALTH CENTER JEFFERSON CITY MO FOUNDATION: $120,624 · OtherST MARY'S HEALTH CENTER JEFFERSON CITY MO FOUNDATIONJEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB: $57,560 · OtherJEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUBJEFFERSON CITY AREA YMCA: $21,400 · Other+1 more: $6,660 · OtherCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri: $185,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Cen…NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC: $102,350 · EducationNORTHWEST FOUN…EL PUENTE-HISPANIC MINISTRY: $11,520 · Religion
Other$526,187Human Services$185,000Education$102,350Religion$11,520

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri: $185,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetST MARY'S HEALTH CENTER JEFFERSON CITY MO FOUNDATION: $120,624 over 2y, 18% of budgetNORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC: $102,350 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJEFFERSON CITY COUNTRY CLUB: $57,560 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJEFFERSON CITY AREA YMCA: $21,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEL PUENTE-HISPANIC MINISTRY: $11,520 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetJEFFERSON CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6,660 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ssm Regional Health Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ssm Regional Health Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ssm Regional Health Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home