Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ssglc Project Rainbow

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$19kHealth$15kCrime & Legal$3kCivil Rights$3kEducation$3kReligion$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLAAD$1,000
ONE INSTITUTE$1,000
THE POINT FOUNDATION$1,000
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GLAD: $3k → 16%LGBT CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $2k → 10%BEING ALIVE: $2k → 14%CELEBRATION THEATER: $2k → 14%CELEBRATION THEATER: $2k → 14%CELEBRATION THEATER: $200 → 14%GAY MENS CHORUS OF LOS ANGELES: $4k → 14%THE TREVOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%THE GAY MENS CHORUS: $200 → 14%OUTFEST: $2k → 14%AIDS PROJECT LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%AIDS PROJECT LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%AIDS PROJECT LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ONE INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $300 → 14%ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $2k → 14%LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $1k → 14%POINT FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $1k → 14%THE POINT FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $1k → 14%GLAAD: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27k · 5 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$27k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+161%

Still filing today

60%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue -13%
  • LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER
    5× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +59%
  • CT
    CELEBRATION THEATER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k

Funded once

  • GM
    Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angelesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +79%
  • GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +161%
  • LC
    LGBT CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Museum of Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender History & Culture

Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people

2
Lgbt Bar Assn of Los Angeles Lgbtq Lawyers Assn of Los Angeles
3
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund Inc

Lambda legal defense and education fund, inc. is a national organization committed to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people, and anyone living with hiv through impact litigation,…

Civil Rights
4
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
5
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

6
American Association of Physicians for Human Right

Glma is a national organization committed to ensuring health equity for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (lgbtq) and all sexual and gender minority (sgm) individuals, and equality for lgbtq/sgm health professionals in their work…

Civil Rights
7
Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists

Aglp is a professional organization of psychiatrists, psychiatry residents, and medical students, and other mental health professionals which serves as a voice for the concerns of lesbians, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people within…

8
Global Philanthropy Project Inc

Global Philanthropy Project (GPP or the Organization) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex…

Philanthropy
9
Glsen Inc

Glsen works to make k-12 education inclusive safe & affirming for all students because no young person should have to choose between their wellbeing and an education. glsen's programs, campaigns, and initiatives improve education…

Civil Rights
10
Imperial Court of Los Angeles Hollywood

Lgbtq social services

11
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
12
International Gay & Lesbian Travel Association Foundation Inc

The iglta foundation is the philanthropic organization of the international gay & lesbian travel association, the leading member-based organization dedicated to lgbtq+ tourism. iglta foundation's mission is empowering lgbtq+ welcoming…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Glaad Inc and the most unlike its peers is Point Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION — $8,600 · OtherONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATIONLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $6,900 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTERCELEBRATION THEATER — $4,600 · OtherCELEBRATION THEATERAIDS PROJECT LOS ANGELES — $3,700 · OtherAIDS PROJECT LOS ANGELESGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles — $3,600 · OtherGay Mens Chorus of Los AngelesLGBT CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY — $2,200 · OtherLGBT CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTYOUTFEST — $2,200 · OtherOUTFESTBEING ALIVE — $2,200 · OtherBEING ALIVE+3 more — $2,200 · Other+3 moreGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC — $3,300 · Civil RightsGLBTQ LEGAL A…TREVOR PROJECT INC — $2,200 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJEC…POINT FOUNDATION — $3,200 · Education
Other$36,200Civil Rights$5,500Education$3,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONE ARCHIVES FOUNDATION — $8,600 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $6,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles — $3,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC — $3,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION — $3,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTFEST — $2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLAAD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David Bohnett FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David Bohnett Foundation · California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ssglc Project Rainbow funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph