Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Ssglc Project Rainbow

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$500
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 5
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$146k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Ssglc Project Rainbow funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$4k50%
FY20244$4k50%
FY20233$3k0%
FY20223$4k0%
FY20213$4k33%
FY20203$7k67%
FY20193$60033%
FY20185$11k60%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$19kHealth$15kCrime & Legal$3kCivil Rights$3kEducation$3kReligion$1k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
One Archives Foundation$8,60070%
Los Angeles Lgbt Center$7,90060%
Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles$4,10020%
AIDS Project Los Angeles$3,7003n/a
Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc$3,30010%
Point Foundation$3,20020%
Outfest$2,20010%
Trevor Project Inc$2,20010%
Glaad Inc$1,00010%
One Institute$1,0001n/a
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Ssglc Project Rainbow by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
One Archives Foundation$8,60070%
Los Angeles Lgbt Center$7,90060%
Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles$4,10020%
AIDS Project Los Angeles$3,7003n/a
Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc$3,30010%
Point Foundation$3,20020%
Outfest$2,20010%
Trevor Project Inc$2,20010%
Glaad Inc$1,00010%
One Institute$1,0001n/a
Project Angel Food$50010%

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($11k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ssglc Project Rainbow supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne Archives Foundation: $8,600 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLos Angeles Lgbt Center: $7,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles: $4,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGlbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: $3,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPoint Foundation: $3,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOutfest: $2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrevor Project Inc: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlaad Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Angel Food: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

David Bohnett FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: David Bohnett Foundation · California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ssglc Project Rainbow with peer funders

About Ssglc Project Rainbow

How much does Ssglc Project Rainbow give?
Ssglc Project Rainbow reported 6 grants totaling $4,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 5 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Ssglc Project Rainbow fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (43%), Health (33%), Crime & Legal (7%).
Who are Ssglc Project Rainbow's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: One Archives Foundation ($9k), Los Angeles Lgbt Center ($8k), Gay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles ($4k).
Does Ssglc Project Rainbow fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ssglc Project Rainbow accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ssglc Project Rainbow?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include David Bohnett Foundation, California Community Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Ssglc Project Rainbow based?
Ssglc Project Rainbow is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ssglc Project Rainbow’s filings →

More from the funding graph