Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rock N Ribs Bbq Festival

To raise funds to distribute to area youth organizations.

$81k
Granted FY2019
7
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of SPRINGFIELD ROTARY PRESIDENTS COUNCIL C/O ANDREW CLEMENS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZARK TRAIL COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS OF$11,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$11,500
GREAT CIRCLE$11,500
HARMONY HOUSE$11,500
OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA$11,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE$11,500
GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH$11,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HARMONY HOUSE: $12k → 15%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $12k → 18%HARMONY HOUSE: $12k → 15%GOOD SAMARITAN BOYS RANCH: $12k → 18%OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $12k → 15%OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $12k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$161k · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$161k
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Human ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue +98%
  • GS
    Good Samaritan Boys Ranch
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue +89%
  • FV
    FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue +69%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS — $23,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKSOZARK TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #306 — $23,000 · OtherOZARK TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #306GREAT CIRCLE — $23,000 · OtherGREAT CIRCLEGood Samaritan Boys Ranch — $23,000 · Human ServicesGood Samaritan Boys RanchFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER — $23,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTEROZARKS REGIONAL YMCA — $23,000 · Human ServicesOZARKS REGIONAL YMCARONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC — $23,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD …
    Other$69,000Human Services$69,000Health$23,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS — $23,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGood Samaritan Boys Ranch — $23,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER — $23,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC — $23,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOZARK TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #306 — $23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOZARKS REGIONAL YMCA — $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Rock N Ribs Bbq Festival funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    2021222324
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
      typical government reliance, FY2024

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph