Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spreetail Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$226k
Granted FY2024still arriving
89
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$134k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$305kHuman Services$241kPhilanthropy$236kHousing & Shelter$202kYouth Development$179kHealth$98kEducation$74kCrime & Legal$68kOther$0
02FY2024 · 89 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
$100
Median grant
18
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MALOUF$133,812
Echo Collective$64,527
Lincoln Community Foundation - Ebert Family Charitable Fund$5,000
Malone Center$2,130
Omaha Community Foundation - Fund 2984$1,750
Brave Be Child Advocacy Center$1,600
The Westside School$1,555
Mourning Hope Grief Center$1,548
I Be Black Girl$1,500
Empowerment Plan$1,373
Omaha Community Foundation$1,184
Westside School$500
Westside Foundation$500
OMAHA FOR US$500
MAKE-A-WISHNEBRASKA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Give Foundation Inc: $54 → 9%FII-National (DBA UpTogether): $150 → 10%ALOHA DIAPER BANK: $400 → 9%PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE: $75 → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $202 → 14%New American Pathways: $392 → 14%Servants At Work Inc: $124 → 16%All-Options: $125 → 18%Coordinated Youth and Human Services: $250 → 12%Cupcake Girls: $200 → 13%FII - National dba UpTogether: $150 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%The Empowerment Plan: $90k → 21%Visionary Youth: $103k → 15%Indiana Women in Need Foundation: $220 → 16%OMAHA FOR US: $500 → 12%UPTOGETHER: $70 → 10%The Empowerment Plan: $19k → 21%Essential Pregnancy Services: $340 → 12%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $2k → 21%Austin Area Urban League: $100 → 10%American National Red Cross: $100 → 14%The Empowerment Plan: $2k → 21%OMAHA FOR US: $125 → 12%American Red cross: $75 → 14%Empowerment Plan: $1k → 21%The Empowerment Plan: $500 → 21%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $500 → 21%Covenant House: $125 → 17%KNIGHTS OF AKSARBEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%Open Door Mission: $1k → 12%Essential Pregnancy Services: $250 → 12%Visionary Youth: $75k → 13%Visionary Youth: $250 → 13%Matt Talbot Kitchen & Outreach: $912 → 13%Matt Talbot Kitchen & Outreach: $475 → 13%MATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH INC: $100 → 13%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 12%Heartland Family Service: $500 → 12%Heartland Family Service: $325 → 12%Heartland Family Service: $150 → 12%Nebraska Children's Home Society: $100 → 12%Foster Care Closet: $283 → 13%Foster Care Closet: $80 → 13%FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $75 → 13%FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $60 → 13%Youth Emergency Services: $55 → 12%Heartland Hope Mission: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 79 repeat orgs$475k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

79 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
237

Total granted

$1.3M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+16%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VY
    VISIONARY YOUTH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $178k · revenue +56% · 51% of their budget
  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $153k · revenue +43%
  • TE
    THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $114k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • BT
    BRIDGES TO HOPEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $54k · revenue +259%
  • RL
    Rebecca Lyn Hausmann Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • WF
    Woman's Fund of Omaha
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
2
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
3
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
4
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
5
Nebraska Children & Families Foundation

Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…

Philanthropy
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
Nebraska Coalition for Life Saving Cures

The nebraska coalition for life saving cures promotes, supports and advocates for research to advance our quality of life and our economy.

Science & Tech
8
Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc

Empowering under-resourced families to change their lives by discovering and overcoming barriers to success.

Human Services
9
Urban League of Nebraska

The mission of the urban league of nebraska is to be an empowering voice in the community advocating for economic self-reliance, parity, power, civil rights and equal opportunity for all (see schedule o). the vision of the urban league of…

Human Services
10
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
11
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa; the most unlike its peers is Rebecca Lyn Hausmann Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

213 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 213 of the 364 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
211/213
Grantees still filing
137/213
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MALOUF: $214,847 · OtherMALOUFFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $152,605 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDIndividual grant recipient: $151,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMALONE CENTER: $87,130 · OtherMALONE CENTERWoman's Fund of Omaha (IBBG): $50,000 · OtherCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $59,341 · OtherCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED+139 more: $313,659 · Other+139 moreVISIONARY YOUTH: $177,750 · Human ServicesVISIONARY YOUTHTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $114,405 · Human ServicesTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN+21 more: $24,461 · Human Services+21 moreFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $151,098 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…+1 more: $205 · Food & NutritionECHO COLLECTIVE: $64,527 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $4,150 · Education+6 more: $4,344 · EducationRebecca Lyn Hausmann Foundation: $50,000 · HealthBryan Foundation: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,916 · Health+12 more: $9,762 · HealthBRIDGES TO HOPE: $53,625 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $10,153 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $2,203 · Crime & LegalMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $64,500 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $650 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,028,632Human Services$316,616Food & Nutrition$151,303Education$73,021Health$72,678Crime & Legal$65,981Housing & Shelter$65,150

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVISIONARY YOUTH: $177,750 over 2y, 51% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $152,605 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $151,098 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $114,405 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetECHO COLLECTIVE: $64,527 over 1y, 25% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $64,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED: $59,341 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBRIDGES TO HOPE: $53,625 over 1y, 20% of budgetRebecca Lyn Hausmann Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetNEBRASKA ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $30,950 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $18,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLincoln Community Foundation Inc: $10,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $10,153 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBryan Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSNET MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $4,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $3,237 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $3,206 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,916 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,829 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE SCHOOL: $2,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Pinkd Inc: $1,974 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOMAHA GIRLS ROCK INC: $1,799 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRESPRING FOUNDATION: $1,790 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,786 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,703 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA AIDS PROJECT INC: $1,702 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOURNING HOPE: $1,648 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1,640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTI-PUPS: $1,575 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEDUCARE OF LINCOLN INC: $1,560 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK AND PINK INC: $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA INC: $1,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetI BE BLACK GIRL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $1,487 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOmaha Community Foundation: $1,184 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACLU NEBRASKA: $1,100 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIBC Network Foundation: $1,008 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $953 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $925 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABIDE NETWORK INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL: $640 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VISIONARY YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN ↗
  • Who funds ECHO COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PEOPLE IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Rebecca Lyn Hausmann Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lincoln Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF AK-SAR-BEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bryan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CROSSNET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE99.6× affinity56 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Abel Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Jc & Jessie Seacrest Family Fndtn First Nebraska Trust Co Trustee · Assurity Life Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spreetail Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spreetail Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spreetail Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Spreetail Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 364 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spreetail’s filings →

More from the funding graph