Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Spirit and Word Ministries Inc

THE MISSION IS TO PROVIDE NON-DENOMINATIONAL SPIRITUAL RESOURCES FOR SPIRITUAL GROWTH, MISSIONAL SOCIAL ACTION AND CHARITABLE OUTREACH PRIMARILY THROUGH THE INTERNET, BROADCAST MEDIA AND PRINT.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$659kAnimals$191kEducation$15kEnvironment$700Human Services$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $700
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$15,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$63,855
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$15,500
ARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD$15,099
COLUMBINE GARDEN CLUB$700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COLUMBINE GARDEN CLUB: $700 → 11%APRAXIA KIDS: $500 → 11%CITY OF HOPEBILL AUSTEN ENDOWMENT: $250k → 14%AMERICAN KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF DALLAS: $1k → 14%EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $13k → 12%BARROW NERUOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CITY OF HOPEBILL AUSTEN ENDOWMENT: $213k → 14%JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF DALLAS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD: $15k → 11%CITY OF HOPEBILL AUSTEN ENDOWMENT: $25k → 14%ARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD: $15k → 11%TRENDS CHARITABLE FUND: $500 → 11%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $102k → 11%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $64k → 11%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $25k → 11%TGEN FOUNDATIONS: $25k → 11%ARIZONA KIDNEY FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%TGEN WOMEN'S PHILANTHROPY COUNCIL: $3k → 11%TGEN WOMEN'S PHILANTHROPY COUNCIL: $2k → 11%TGEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $31k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $26k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $16k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $14k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $11k → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOC: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$605k · 5 repeat orgs$286k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$605k
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-3%

Still filing today

80%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $275k · revenue +117%
  • AH
    Arizona Humane Society
    3× · 2022–2024 · $191k · revenue +38%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $103k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF HOPEBILL AUSTEN ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $213k
  • TF
    TGEN FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • NK
    National Kidney Foundation of Arizona
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
3
Asn Foundation for Kidney Research

To prevent and cure kidney diseases through research and innovation.

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
6
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
American Physiological Society

Empowering scientists to understand life and improve health by advancing and communicating discoveries in physiology and medicine.

Health
10
Azcert Dba Crediblemeds Medsafetyscan

To foster the safe use of medicines for healthcare providers, research scientists and the public.

Health
11
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
12
American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine

The mission of the american college of veterinary internal medicine (acvim) is to enhance animal and human health by advancing veterinary internal medicine through training, education, an discovery. the acvim is the american certifying…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barrow Neurological Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Apraxia Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $275,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTERAmerican Heart Association Inc — $102,915 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD — $30,499 · HealthARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD+2 more — $10,500 · HealthCITY OF HOPEBILL AUSTEN ENDOWMENT — $212,500 · OtherCITY OF HOPEBILL AUSTEN ENDOWMENTTGEN FOUNDATIONS — $25,000 · OtherTGEN FOUNDATIONSNational Kidney Foundation of Arizona — $15,000 · OtherNational Kidney Foundation of Ari…+4 more — $13,480 · OtherArizona Humane Society — $191,186 · AnimalsArizona Humane SocietyEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $12,658 · EducationJESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF DALLAS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · EducationCOLUMBINE GARDEN CLUB — $700 · EnvironmentTrends Charitable Fund — $500 · Philanthropy
Health$418,914Other$265,980Animals$191,186Education$13,658Environment$700Philanthropy$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $275,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society — $191,186 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $102,915 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA WOMEN'S BOARD — $30,499 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation of Arizona — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $12,658 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF DALLAS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrends Charitable Fund — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetApraxia Kids — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Spirit and Word Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spirit and Word Ministries Inc?

Find your warmest path to Spirit and Word Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph