Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2018
24
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$17k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to American Endowment Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $38k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
15
’18
0
’19
0
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$847kReligion$23kInternational$22kHealth$10kScience & Tech$6kEducation$2kArts & Culture$1kCivil Rights$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k23 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$172
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL FUND OF ISREAL$17,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL$5,100
Individual grant recipient$4,145
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WIEZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$3,000
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH$3,000
FRIENDS OF YEMIN ORDE$2,200
ADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY$1,800
CONGREGATION TORAH OHR INC$518
TORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC$500
HADASSAH$215
CONGREGATION ANSHEI SHALOM$175
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS AMERICAN SECTION$172
THE PAPANICOLAU CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC$150
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$100
Individual grant recipient$90
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $36) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $36 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MO
MD
KS
SC
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43k · 10 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +141% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
19

Total granted

$43k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+141%
+4%

Still filing today

40%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthInternationalArts & CultureReligionPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +213%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200 · revenue +25%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $80 · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PELECH ZICHRON YAAKOV
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE SHAARAY ZEDAK HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • CO
    COMMITTEE OF ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
3
Yad Vashem Usa Foundation

Yad vashem usa foundation (the organization) is dedicated to support the memorialization and awareness of, and education regarding, the holocaust, as currently overseen, supervised and conducted by yad vashem, the holocaust martyrs and…

Arts & Culture
4
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
5
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
8
Jewish War Veterans of the United States

The Organization was granted a charter as a not for profit corporation for patriotic and educational purposes with special concern for the welfare of veterans. The Organization's principal activities consist of protecting the benefits and…

—
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
11
Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International
12
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society for Yad Vashem Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $847,130 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $24,630 · OtherFRIENDS OF PELECH ZICHRON YAAKOV: $13,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL: $7,100 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WIEZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $5,500 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE SHAARAY ZEDAK HOSPITAL: $3,750 · OtherCOMMITTEE OF ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST: $2,500 · Other+23 more: $3,098 · OtherCentral Fund of Israel: $17,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC: $2,200 · International+2 more: $200 · InternationalFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $4,000 · HealthMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,975 · Health+2 more: $168 · HealthADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY: $1,800 · EducationTORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC: $500 · EducationAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 · Arts & CultureWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $672 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $500 · Religion
Philanthropy$847,130Other$59,578International$19,400Health$6,143Education$2,300Arts & Culture$1,200Religion$1,172

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $847,130 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,975 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $672 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAPANICOLAOU CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $80 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Spencer Raphael Jaffe Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spencer Raphael Jaffe’s filings →

More from the funding graph