Skip to content

· Private foundation

Specter Etal Trs Specter Char Tr-Ima

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2020
15
Grants FY2020
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$357k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORMAN SCHOOL$2,500
PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$1,800
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$1,000
NARAL$1,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$1,000
ST ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL INC$1,000
UPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FDN$500
WILBRAHAM & MONSON ACADEMY$500
GREATER PITTSBURGH LITERACY COUNCIL$500
OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS$500
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%WILBRAHAM & MONSON ACADEMY: $500 → 17%GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 → 11%OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $500 → 8%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%ST ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL INC: $1k → 12%MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%FORMAN SCHOOL: $3k → 9%PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $2k → 11%NARAL: $1k → 14%UPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FDN: $500 → 11%GREATER PITTSBURGH LITERACY COUNCIL: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
KY
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
6
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University; the most unlike its peers is Operation Freedom Paws. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORMAN SCHOOL INC: $2,500 · OtherFORMAN SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYNARAL: $1,000 · OtherNARALST ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · OtherST ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL INCMOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY: $500 · OtherWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMYUPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FDN: $500 · OtherUPMC MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES FDNNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITYSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $500 · EducationLITERACY PITTSBURGHPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $2,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH CU…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,800 · HealthPLANNED PARE…OPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $500 · Public BenefitGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$8,500Education$3,500Arts & Culture$2,000Health$1,800Public Benefit$500Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORMAN SCHOOL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Specter Etal Trs Specter Char Tr-Ima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Specter Etal Trs Specter Char Tr-Ima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Wilbraham and Monson Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Specter Etal Trs Specter Char Tr-Ima’s filings →

More from the funding graph