· Public charity
Special Operations Care Fund Inc
Connect people to the special operations community via events and ongoing engagements.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $914,184 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,816,889 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $902,705 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $369k
- $250k+1 grant · $503k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VETS | $503,000 |
| WARRIOR'S HEART FOUNDATION | $196,111 |
| HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT LLC | $172,700 |
| THE STEPS FOUNDATION | $13,660 |
| SOCIAL SERVICES NETWORK INC | $10,830 |
| TASK DAGGER FOUNDATION | $10,783 |
| FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION | $7,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +121% · 33% of their budget
- FHFRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $972k · revenue +41% · 42% of their budget
- HHHEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC3× · 2022–2024 · $868k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- ERE3 RANCH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $225k · revenue +57%
- SOSOUND OFFgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +181%
- ASALL SECURE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The peaceful warrior foundation is a non-profit organization with the aim of connecting our nation's warriors with the support and care they need.at peaceful warrior we strive to help our active-duty operators & veterans be at their very…
For veteran's sake foundation is here to provide an alternative solution to dealing with pts (post traumatic stress). we use a combination of a (non-therapeutic) neuro-traumatic resourcing, service dogs and consulting. working with the…
Warfighter Outfitters believe in the healing power of the outdoors. Since 2014, we have provided free fishing, hunting, and engagement trips to disabled veterans. On the water or in the woods, these veteran-only trips help service men and…
Therapy services for frontline workers such as military, police officers and fire fighters. Free mental heath services.
To provide scuba instruction for veterans with ptsd. the weightlessness of scuba provides a peaceful respite from the pressures and trauma of military service. scuba for amputees provides a freedom of movement not experienced for years…
Our mission is to honor the legacy of fallen us special operations forces by enhancing the quality of life for special ops veterans and their families. (continued on schedule o).
Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…
Founded by veterans dedicated to prevention of veteran suicides provided support to other veterans organizations including ptsd trained dogs
The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.
To empower and support veterans.
Wounded War Heroes was founded to show our appreciation to the men and women who have been wounded or injured as a result of serving our country, by providing them therapeutic outdoor experiences upon their return home from fighting for…
Frontline to field is a nonprofit organization founded from the hearts of two individuals deeply committed to the well-being of those who serve and sacrifice for others. inspired by their personal connections to the military, first…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Steps Foundation and the most unlike its peers is All in All the Time. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE STATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VETSVETERANS EXPLORING TREATMENT SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds WARRIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE HEALING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SOWW Corp ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HEALING FORCES INC ↗
- Who funds Pillar Foundation ↗
- Who funds RESCUE 22 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALL IN ALL THE TIME ↗
- Who funds E3 RANCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUND OFF ↗
- Who funds ALL SECURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TORN WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds PARARESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OPS XCURSIONS ↗
- Who funds HUNTER SEVEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE STEPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL SERVICES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Task Force Dagger Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE RICK HERREMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Alongside Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Brcc Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Gift Fund · Synchrony Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Special Operations Care Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Social Services Network Inc — 100% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Special Operations Care Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Special Operations Care Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.