Skip to content

· Public charity

Southwest Key Programs Inc

The mission is opening doors to opportunity, so individuals can achieve their dreams.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.9MHuman Services$1.2MCivil Rights$62kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$46kEnvironment$38kArts & Culture$36kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,236,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,333,037 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $97,037 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$256M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUENOS FOUNDATION$1,000,000
LA CASA DE ESPERANZA INC$73,500
CENTER FOR TRAINING & CARRERS INC$50,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$40,000
LA RAZA HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY$20,000
CHCI (CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC)$15,000
FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT COMMUNICATIONS INC$15,000
US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRATION$10,000
SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,500
TEXAS HERITAGE AND INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC: $10k → 23%SUENOS FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $15k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 5 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$4.1M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-6%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEmploymentArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VALERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3.8M · revenue +54%
  • LA CASA DE ESPERANZA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $119k · revenue +23%
  • CH
    CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • EB
    ECO-SOAP BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +297%
  • AE
    AUSTIN EAST AUSTIN LIONS CLUB BRANCH
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science

Sacnas is an inclusive organization dedicated to fostering the success of chicanos/hispanics and native americans, from college students to professionals, in attaining advanced degrees, careers, and positions of leadership in stem.

Science & Tech
2
Santos Manuel Student Union of Csusb

The student union, through its programs and facilities, is a focal point of the campus through assisting in the retention and development of students while encouraging a deeper understanding and appreciation of cultural pluralism, gender…

Education
3
El Centro De La Raza

As an organization grounded in the latino community of washington state, our mission is to build the beloved community through unifying all racial and economic sectors; to organize, empower, and defend the basic human rights of our most…

Human Services
4
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

—
5
United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the united states hispanic chamber of commerce (ushcc) is to build an ecosystem to accelerate hispanic business growth and prosperity.

—
6
Cesar Chavez Public Charter School for Public Policy

To prepare students to succeed in competitive colleges and to empower them to use public policy to create a more just, free, and equal world.

Education
7
Latino Chamber of Commerce of Dane County Inc

Our mission is to maximize economic development and job creation though advocacy and programs that generate success and value for our Latino and Non-Latino business community.

Community Improvement
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
Credit Unions in the State of California Sierra Central Credit Union

As your financial institution, we pledge to serve you and our community faithfully. we will be friendly, helpful, and professional, and we will provide great products and competitive rates.

—
10
Central American Refugee Center Carecen Ny

All people should have the right to work, build a community and determine their own future with a sense of dignity. the displacement of thousands of central americans into north america as a result of war and civil strife in their…

Human Services
11
Cristo Rey San Jose High School

Cristo rey san jose is a jesuit, catholic college-prep high school that combines rigorous academics with professional work internships, preparing students from underserved communities in silicon valley to (see schedule o)pursue college and…

Education
12
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Bereavement Center of the Rio Grande Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is La Raza Historical Society of Santa Clara Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $3,843,027 · EducationVALERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC+1 more: $40,000 · EducationSUENOS FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesSUENOS FOUNDATION+2 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesLA CASA DE ESPERANZA INC: $118,500 · OtherLULAC COUNCIL #22325: $47,000 · OtherCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC: $45,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR STUDENT COMMUNICATIONINC: $24,000 · OtherAUSTIN EAST AUSTIN LIONS CLUB BRANCH: $17,500 · OtherUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $10,000 · OtherPRIMERA LLC: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $12,500 · OtherCENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC: $50,000 · EmploymentECO-SOAP BANK: $38,000 · HealthLA RAZA HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$3,883,027Human Services$1,025,000Other$294,500Employment$50,000Health$38,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $3,843,027 over 3y, 24% of budgetSUENOS FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 86% of budgetLA CASA DE ESPERANZA INC: $118,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECO-SOAP BANK: $38,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENT COMMUNICATIONINC: $24,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetLA RAZA HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BISHOP ENRIQUE SAN PEDRO OZANAM CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREATER SAN ANTONIO CHAMBER OF COMME: $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwest Key Programs Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwest Key Programs Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southwest Key Programs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph