How much did SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES PLANNING AND grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES PLANNING AND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

greatercareerhuntingdon

2021

industrialcommercialboroughgreaterctccareer technologybedford

2022

conservationboroughbedfordattractretain

2023

somersetattractretain

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
$250k+4 grants · $5.3M

$120,867

Median grant

—

States reached

$31M

Total assets

Largest grants

GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$2,602,488
TABELAND SERVICES INC$1,411,468
HUNTINGDON EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING$831,302
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION$444,396
BEDFORD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION$160,171
JOHNSTOWN AREA REGIONAL INDUSTRIES$152,744
HUNTINGDON BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY$129,015
HUNTINGDON COUNTY CHILD AND ADULT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$122,735
ABCD CORPORATION$120,867
ST FRANCIS UNIVERSITY$105,531
SOMERSET COUNTY$85,916
NORTHERN TIER REGIONAL PLANNING$73,242
NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL PLANNING$70,233
DELTA DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC$31,773
SOUTH HILLS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY$15,967

02Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$30M · 25 repeat orgs$683k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$30M

$683k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%

-17%

Still filing today

44%

18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementEmploymentEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GI
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES
8× · 2018–2025 · $14M · revenue +52%
TS
TABELAND SERVICES INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +74%
HE
HUNTINGDON EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
8× · 2018–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +17% · 49% of their budget

Funded once

BF
BEN FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $127k
GA
GREATER ALTOONA CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $114k
GA
GREATER ALTOONA CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $86k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Muncie-Delaware County

Economic development

—

Delaware County Economic Development

To promote economic development in delaware county pennsylvania.

—

Bennington County Industrial

Industrial development.

—

Lawrence County Industrial Development

Industrial development

—

Jefferson County Development

The council's objective is to assist in industrial & economic development in jefferson county pa using loan programs and all other resources available.

—

Erie County Economic Development

To facilitate both the creation and retention of jobs within erie county and increase economic opportunities for individuals and businesses through comprehensive economic development programs.

—

Franklin County Economic

The edc is committed to serving new and existing businesses and industries, and to assist with the creation and retention of quality jobs through direct and collaborative funding of projects for the economic well being of franklin county.

Community Improvement

Northeastern Pennsylvania Industrial Resource Center Inc

Community Improvement

Allentown Economic Development

To proactively identify, encourage, and develop business opportunities for the lehigh valley.

Community Improvement

Chester County Economic Development

To foster economic growth in chester county, pa by providing means to low interest financing for new and existing businesses, site selection assistance, grant management and other services.

—

Johnstown Business District Development

Real estate development

—

Delaware County Economic

Industry expansion in delaware county

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johnstown Area Regional Industries and the most unlike its peers is Saint Francis University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

11/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$17,640,778Human Services$6,008,620Employment$5,346,321Community Improvement$1,142,258Education$721,381Environment$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of GreaterPA32× affinity13 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater · I Car Education Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES PLANNING AND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HUNTINGDON EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 251380927 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HUNTINGDON EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 49% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Southern Alleghenies Planning And?

Find your warmest path to Southern Alleghenies Planning And through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES PLANNING AND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Southern Alleghenies Planning And?

More from the funding graph

SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES PLANNING AND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Southern Alleghenies Planning And?

More from the funding graph