Loading…
· Public charity
Southeast Georgia Health System Inc
Southeast Georgia Health System, Inc., will provide safe, quality, accessible, and cost-effective care to meet the health needs of the people and communities it serves.
$1.3M
Granted FY2025
1
Grants
1
Communities
$409k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of Southeast Georgia Health System Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
primary exemptexempt acitivyexempt activity
2020
primary exemptexempt activity
2021
primary exemptexempt acitivyexempt activity
2022
primary exemptexempt activityexempt acitivy
2023
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$408,698
Median grant
1
States reached
$636M
Total assets
Largest grants
- SE GA Health System Foundation Inc$408,698
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
1
Total granted
$3.2M
$10k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+24%
-7%
Still filing today
90%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Youth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SGSE GA Health System Foundation Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +20% · 29% of their budget
- DLDavis Love III Foundation5× · 2018–2022 · $273k · revenue +44%
- CCCoastal Community Health Svcs2× · 2021–2022 · $56k · revenue +275%
Funded once
- FBForward Brunswickone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Gulf South Conference
To promote, regulate and control all recognized intercollegiate athletics sponsored by the member institutions through the maintenance of high standards of honor and fair play
Recreation & Sports
2
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc
To protect land through conservation easements and similar land conservation tools and to provide solutions and scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources focusing on the southeastern united states.
Environment
3
Georgia State Golf Association
Promotion of game/rules of golf throughout the state of georgia
Recreation & Sports
4
United States Center for Safesport
Our mission is to make athlete well-being the centerpiece of our nation's sports culture.
Recreation & Sports
5
Georgia State University Athletic
To provide advice, guidance, and leadership to advance athletics at georgia state university.
—
6
Coastal Carolina Council Bsa
To prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them
—
7
United Way of the Coastal Empire
United way of the coastal empire's mission is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community. we do that by raising funds to support nonprofit partners and providing direct assistance to people through the 211 call center…
Philanthropy
8
Southeast Georgia Health System Inc
Southeast georgia health system, inc., will provide safe, quality, accessible, and cost-effective care to meet the health needs of the people and communities it serves.
Health
9
Foundation for the Carolinas
Foundation for the carolinas is a non-profit community foundation serving donors and a broad range of charitable purposes in north and south carolina through grantmaking and civic leadership.
Philanthropy
10
Georgia Care Connection Office Inc
See schedule o for complete description.the mission of georgia cares is to ensure that child sex trafficking victims receive quality care and services in the state of georgia. georgia cares is the single, statewide coordinating agency to…
—
11
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance
Facilitate networking among hospitals
Health
12
Us Naval Sea Cadet Corps
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coastal Community and the most unlike its peers is Davis Love Iii Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,769,772Philanthropy$272,500Health$90,800Youth Development$63,000Community Improvement$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SE GA Health System Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Davis Love III Foundation ↗
- Who funds Coastal Community Health Svcs ↗
- Who funds Boy Scouts of America ↗
- Who funds American Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds Coastal Symphony of GA ↗
- Who funds Golden Isles FCA ↗
- Who funds United Way of Coastal Georgia ↗
- Who funds Brunswick Port Society ↗
- Who funds Forward Brunswick ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Communities of Coastal GeorgiaGA15.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Communities of Coastal Georgia · Torras Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Southeast Georgia Health System Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SE GA Health System Foundation Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~31 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 582125644 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SE GA Health System Foundation Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 31 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 29% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Southeast Georgia Health System Inc?
Find your warmest path to Southeast Georgia Health System Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines