Skip to content
Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition Inc

To support and serve immigrants and refugees and other politically, socially, and economically marginalized communities as they seek to advance the condition of their lives in the united states.

$299k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Public Benefit$317kHuman Services$70kEducation$70kYouth Development$70kCivil Rights$40kFood & Nutrition$30k
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAKASECWOORI CENTER$40,000
ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED$35,000
PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY$30,000
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS PHI$30,000
BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOC OF PITTSBURGH$30,000
PENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES$20,000
BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOC OF SCRANTON$20,000
KITHS INTEGRATED & TARGETED HUMAN SERVICE$16,000
AL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE$16,000
OXFORD CIRCLE CCDA$16,000
PHILADELPHIA PRAISE CENTER$15,040
SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA$11,667
NaFFAA-PA CHAPTER$10,000
URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS PHI: $40k → 22%KITHS INTEGRATED & TARGETED HUMAN SERVICE: $16k → 22%COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS PHI: $30k → 22%OXFORD CIRCLE CCDA: $16k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$479k · 8 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$479k
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+11%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NK
    NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $90k · revenue +193%
  • C
    CAIR-PENNSYLVANIA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +70%
  • SO
    SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +37%
  • PA
    PENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +51%
  • BC
    BHUTANESE CULTURAL FOUNDATION OF SCRANTON
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
2
The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association
Human Services
3
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc

The mission of asian americans advancing justice-aajc (aajc) is to advance civil and human rights for asian americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all.

Civil Rights
4
New World Association of Emigrants Eastern Europe Inc

New world association of emigrants from eastern europe, inc. is a non-profit community based service and adult literacy organization dedicated to the educational and economic advancement of the disadvantaged as well as the russian/eastern…

—
5
Asian Arts Initiative

The asian arts initiative is a community-based arts center in philadelphia that engages artists and everyday people to create art that explores the diverse experiences of asian americans, addresses our social context, imagines and affects…

Arts & Culture
6
Acculturation for Justice Access & Peace Outreach

Ajapo's mission is to provide a continuum of care which empowers refugees and immigrants to become self-sufficient and integrated into the greater pittsburgh community in allegheny county. ajapo is a refugee resettlement agency providing…

Human Services
7
Arab American Community Networ

it is to unity the immigrates and give them access to education that will help them get settled and progress

Human Services
8
Asian-American National Committee Inc

Various national educational programs and services.

Arts & Culture
9
Asian Services in Action Inc

To serve, support, and advocate for asian americans and pacific islanders (aapis), and immigrants and refugees, so they prosper and flourish.

Human Services
10
Vietnamese American Cultural Alliance
Arts & Culture
11
Council of Indian Organizations in Greater Philadelphia

Promote and preserve cultural heritage of India

Community Improvement
12
Juntos

Juntos is a community-led, latine, immigrant organization in south philadelphia fighting for our human rights as workers, parents, youth, and immigrants. we believe that every human being has the right to a quality education and the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bhutanese Community Association of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Cair-Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $60,000 · OtherURBAN AFFAIRS COALITI…PHILADELPHIA PRAISE CENTER: $32,040 · OtherPHILADELPHIA PRAISE C…BHUTANESE CULTURAL FOUNDATION OF SCRANTON: $20,000 · OtherBHUTANESE CULTURAL FO…NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $90,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL KOREAN AMER…NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC: $20,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL FEDERATION …CAIR-PENNSYLVANIA: $70,400 · Human ServicesCAIR-PENNSYLVANIAOXFORD CIRCLE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesOXFORD CIRCLE CHRIS…KITHS INTEGRATED AND TARGETED HUMAN SERVICES INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesKITHS INTEGRATED AN…BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $67,000 · Arts & CultureBHUTANESE COMMU…AL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE: $16,000 · Arts & CultureAL-BUSTAN SEEDS…SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA: $70,000 · EducationSUNRISE OF PH…ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentASIAN AMERICA…THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · EnvironmentPENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Health
Other$112,040Civil Rights$110,000Human Services$102,400Arts & Culture$83,000Education$70,000Youth Development$70,000Environment$30,000Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $90,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCAIR-PENNSYLVANIA: $70,400 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA: $70,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC: $70,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetBHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $67,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FEDERATION OF FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC: $20,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetPENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE: $16,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetOXFORD CIRCLE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKITHS INTEGRATED AND TARGETED HUMAN SERVICES INC: $16,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…Philanthropy Network …The William Penn Foun…Pennsylvania VoicePA Alliance FoundationScattergood Behaviora…Bread and Roses Commu…The Barra Foundation …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Philadelphia FoundationPA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia · The William Penn Foundation · Pennsylvania Voice · PA Alliance Foundation · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The Barra Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home