· Public charity
Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition Inc
To support and serve immigrants and refugees and other politically, socially, and economically marginalized communities as they seek to advance the condition of their lives in the united states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAKASECWOORI CENTER | $40,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED | $35,000 |
| COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS PHI | $30,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOC OF PITTSBURGH | $30,000 |
| BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOC OF SCRANTON | $20,000 |
| PENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES | $20,000 |
| AL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE | $16,000 |
| OXFORD CIRCLE CCDA | $16,000 |
| KITHS INTEGRATED & TARGETED HUMAN SERVICE | $16,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA PRAISE CENTER | $15,040 |
| SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA | $11,667 |
| URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION | $10,000 |
| NaFFAA-PA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NKNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC2× · 2020–2021 · $90k · revenue +193%
- CCAIR-PENNSYLVANIA2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +70%
- SOSUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +158%
Funded once
- TPTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +37%
- BCBHUTANESE CULTURAL FOUNDATION OF SCRANTONone grant, 2021 · $20k
- PAPENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New world association of emigrants from eastern europe, inc. is a non-profit community based service and adult literacy organization dedicated to the educational and economic advancement of the disadvantaged as well as the russian/eastern…
The asian arts initiative is a community-based arts center in philadelphia that engages artists and everyday people to create art that explores the diverse experiences of asian americans, addresses our social context, imagines and affects…
Ajapo's mission is to provide a continuum of care which empowers refugees and immigrants to become self-sufficient and integrated into the greater pittsburgh community in allegheny county. ajapo is a refugee resettlement agency providing…
it is to unity the immigrates and give them access to education that will help them get settled and progress
Various national educational programs and services.
To serve, support, and advocate for asian americans and pacific islanders (aapis), and immigrants and refugees, so they prosper and flourish.
Promote and preserve cultural heritage of India
Juntos is a community-led, latine, immigrant organization in south philadelphia fighting for our human rights as workers, parents, youth, and immigrants. we believe that every human being has the right to a quality education and the…
The East Coast Asian American Student Union's mission is to inspire, educate, and empower those interested in Asian, Asian American, Pacific Islander, and Pacific Islander American (API/A) issues. Run solely by volunteers, ECAASU's…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bhutanese Community Association of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Cair-Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds CAIR-PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PENN ASIAN SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC ↗
- Who funds AL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE ↗
- Who funds KITHS INTEGRATED AND TARGETED HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OXFORD CIRCLE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia · The William Penn Foundation · Pennsylvania Voice · PA Alliance Foundation · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The Barra Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.