Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

South of Market Merchants & Individual Lifestyle Events

Folsom Street is a 501c3 non-profit arts and culture organization that produces iconic events that benefit our whole community.

$161k
Granted FY2019
10
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172019.

Health$161kArts & Culture$75kHuman Services$66kCommunity Improvement$43kCrime & Legal$6kOther$95k
02FY2019 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
$17,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SistersPerpetual Indulgence$21,283
SF LGBT Community Ctr$21,000
Castro Country Club$18,700
Berkeley Free Clinic$17,500
National AIDS Memorial Grove$17,500
AIDS Legal Referral Panel$17,000
Frameline$15,000
Positive Resource Center$13,500
San Francisco Gay Mens Chorus$13,500
TurnOut$6,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TurnOut: $7k → 10%TurnOut: $6k → 10%National AIDS Memorial Grove: $20k → 10%National AIDS Memorial Grove: $18k → 10%National AIDS Memorial Grove: $16k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$336k · 8 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +62% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$336k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+62%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    Baker Places Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +91%
  • Berkeley Community Health Project DBA Berkeley Free Clinic
    3× · 2017–2019 · $54k · revenue +2%
  • AL
    AIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $52k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • PI
    Project Inform
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue -71%
  • GL
    Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Societygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +139%
  • PA
    Pets Are Wonderful Support
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Immigrant Protection

The LGBTAP is the only San Francisco nonprofit organization exclusively dedicated to providing accessible legal representation for LGBT asylum seekers who are fleeing persecution due to their sexual orientation, gener identity and/or HIV…

Crime & Legal
2
Sunburst Projects

Sunburst Projects serves the needs of the HIV/AIDS community through compassionate care and services.

Unclassified
3
Sacramento Lgbt Community Center

The Center works to create a region where all LGBTQ+ people thrive; we support health and wellness,advocate for equity and justice, and work to uplift our diverse and culturally rich LGBTQ+ community.

4
The Spahr Center

The Spahr Center provides cultural, community, and health programs and direct services that celebrate and support Marin County, California's LGBTQ+ and HIV communities.

5
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
6
Transgender Law Center

Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.

Civil Rights
7
San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Pride Inc

San diego lesbian gay bisexual transgender pride, inc. is a non-profit volunteer-led human rights and arts & culture organization. its mission is to foster pride, equality, and respect for all lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender…

Civil Rights
8
Partnership to End Aids Status Inc

Maximize equlity in trans community

Education
9
Detour Productions

Detour Productions centers the prismatic experiences of queers & people of color through bold performance, film, and education.

Arts & Culture
10
Oakland Lgbtq Community Center Inc

The Oakland LGBTQ Community Center is dedicated to enhancing and sustaining the well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) individuals, our families and allies, by providing educational, social, and health related…

Community Improvement
11
Qcc the Center for Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Art & Culture

Queer Cultural Center promotes social justice and the artistic and financial development of queer art and culture. We steward artists whose programs nourish, connect and mobilize trans & queer communities in San Francisco and its diaspora.

Arts & Culture
12
Cal-Pep Inc

Calpep is dedicated to providing coordinated hiv, substance abuse, mental health, employment support, and violence prevention services to the highest need communities of color in the san francisco bay area.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Project Inform. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Baker Places Inc — $54,867 · HealthBaker Places IncBerkeley Community Health Project DBA Berkeley Free Clinic — $53,533 · HealthBerkeley Community Health Project DBA Be…AIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA — $52,100 · HealthAIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRA…PRC — $45,187 · OtherPRCSisters of Perpetual Indulgence Inc — $21,283 · OtherSisters of Perpetual Ind…Project Inform — $11,000 · OtherProject InformGay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society — $11,000 · OtherGay Lesbian Bisexual Tra…Pets Are Wonderful Support — $7,000 · OtherPets Are Wonderful Suppo…Frameline Inc — $47,367 · Arts & CultureFrameline IncGOLDEN GATE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $27,500 · Arts & CultureGOLDEN GATE PERFORM…TIDES CENTER — $53,100 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERTURNOUT INC — $13,200 · Human ServicesTURNOUT INCSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $42,667 · Community ImprovementSAN FRANCI…EROTIC SERVICE PROVIDER LEGAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH — $5,500 · Crime & Legal
Health$160,500Other$95,470Arts & Culture$74,867Human Services$66,300Community Improvement$42,667Crime & Legal$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBaker Places Inc — $54,867 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBerkeley Community Health Project DBA Berkeley Free Clinic — $53,533 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $53,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA — $52,100 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFrameline Inc — $47,367 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPRC — $45,187 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $42,667 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN GATE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $27,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSisters of Perpetual Indulgence Inc — $21,283 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetProject Inform — $11,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society — $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEROTIC SERVICE PROVIDER LEGAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH — $5,500 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Horizons FoundationCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Horizons Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Grass Roots Gay Rights Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization South of Market Merchants & Individual Lifestyle Events funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to South of Market Merchants & Individual Lifestyle Events?

    Find your warmest path to South of Market Merchants & Individual Lifestyle Events through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph