Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

South Dakota Education Access Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2018
25
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$387k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of SOUTH DAKOTA EDUCATION ACCESS FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2018 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $708k
$56,792
Median grant
4
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$386,800
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHDAKOTA$321,500
MAPPING YOUR FUTURE$170,666
BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY$140,800
NATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$110,100
NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY$107,773
SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$99,300
SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND$78,900
DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$72,100
LAKE AREA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$69,500
AUGUSTANA COLLEGE$62,600
OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE$60,500
WESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$56,792
UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS$50,700
MITCHELL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$45,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREAT LAKES HIGHER ED: $45k → 10%SITTING BULL COLLEGE: $7k → 33%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $63k → 9%SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $72k → 10%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $141k → 11%LAKE AREA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $70k → 11%NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $108k → 11%MOUNT MARTY COLLEGE: $45k → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $387k → 13%MITCHELL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $45k → 14%NATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $120k → 14%SISSETON WAHPETON COLLEGE: $8k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHDAKOTA: $322k → 20%SINTE GLESKA UNIVERSITY: $28k → 40%OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $61k → 42%SITTING BULL COLLEGE: $7k → 33%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $63k → 9%DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 10%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $141k → 11%LAKE AREA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $66k → 11%NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $76k → 11%MOUNT MARTY COLLEGE: $44k → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $385k → 13%MITCHELL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $45k → 14%NATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $110k → 14%SISSETON WAHPETON COLLEGE: $8k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHDAKOTA: $318k → 20%SINTE GLESKA UNIVERSITY: $22k → 40%OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $60k → 42%UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $51k → 9%PRESENTATION COLLEGE: $31k → 11%AVERA SACRED HEART RAD TECH: $1k → 11%DAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $39k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND: $79k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $49k → 9%PRESENTATION COLLEGE: $30k → 11%AVERA SACRED HEART RAD TECH: $1k → 11%DAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $39k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND: $75k → 14%NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%HEADLINE ACADEMY: $10k → 14%SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $103k → 9%BLACK HILLS BEAUTY COLLEGE: $8k → 14%SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $99k → 9%HEADLINE ACADEMY: $3k → 14%WESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $66k → 14%WESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $57k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 24 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$4.0M
$53k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $126k · revenue +79%
  • OL
    OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $120k · revenue +22%
  • MM
    MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $89k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • GL
    GREAT LAKES HIGHER ED
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • BH
    BLACK HILLS BEAUTY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
4
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
5
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
8
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
9
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
10
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
11
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
12
University of Dubuque

The university of dubuque is a private university offering undergraduate, graduate, and theological seminary degrees, and other educational opportunities with the intention of educating and forming the whole person. the university is…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mount Marty University and the most unlike its peers is Mapping Your Future. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $771,700 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHDAKOTA — $639,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHDAKOTABLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY — $282,100 · OtherBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITYNATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $229,600 · OtherNATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITYSOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE — $202,500 · OtherSOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTENORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY — $187,675 · OtherNORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES AND — $154,000 · OtherDAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $141,700 · OtherLAKE AREA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE — $135,500 · OtherWESTERN DAKOTA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE — $122,592 · Other+10 more — $251,123 · Other+10 moreMAPPING YOUR FUTURE — $349,207 · EducationMAPPING YOUR FUTUREAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION — $125,500 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASS…OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE — $120,000 · EducationOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS — $100,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALL…MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY — $89,400 · EducationMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITYDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $78,000 · EducationDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSI…Presentation College — $61,000 · EducationPresentation CollegeSOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,117,690Education$923,207Philanthropy$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION — $125,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE — $120,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS — $100,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY — $89,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $78,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPresentation College — $61,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSITTING BULL COLLEGE — $13,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAPPING YOUR FUTURE
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds OGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS
  • Who funds MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Presentation College
  • Who funds SITTING BULL COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · The Hatterscheidt Foundation Inc · Edward L Schwab Memorial Foundation Dacotah Bank · American Indian Higher Education Consortium Inc · American Indian College Fund · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization South Dakota Education Access Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to South Dakota Education Access Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to South Dakota Education Access Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph