Skip to content

· Public charity

Soroptimist International of Sacramento Club 116502

Soroptimist is a global volunteer organization that provides women and girls with access to the education and training they need to achieve economic empowerment.

$55k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$107kYouth Development$25kFood & Nutrition$15kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $55,250 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$624k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
My Sisters House$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WELLSPRING WOMENS CENTER: $10k → 12%CHICKS IN CRISIS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 3 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +501% since the first grant, against +73% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$89k
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+501%
+73%

Still filing today

33%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $27k
  • SM
    SINGLE MOM STRONG INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $22k · revenue +501%

Funded once

  • TH
    TUBMAN HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • SJ
    SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
Court Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt

To provide all abused and neglected children with a voice in the court process.

Civil Rights
3
Still She Rises Inc

Legal representation and advocacy on behalf of mother and caregivers in Tulsa County facing criminal or misdemeanor charges, civil court and some juvenile cases.

Crime & Legal
4
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
6
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
7
Girls Rising Above Child Exploitation Inc

To support, empower, and provide services to victims of child exploitation and at-risk youth.

Human Services
8
Dress for Success Sacramento

Dress for Success Sacramento is an affiliate of Dress for Success Worldwide a nonprofit that empowers women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support professional attire and the development tools to help women…

—
9
Creative Change Counseling

Working together with families and communities for children to help keep them healthy safe and smart

Health
10
Single Parent Support Inc

Providing support for single parent

Human Services
11
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
12
Girlsmart Literacy Program
Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roberts Family Development Center; the most unlike its peers is 916 Ink. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $39,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $27,497 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTUBMAN HOUSE: $15,000 · OtherTUBMAN HOUSEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL: $15,000 · OtherSAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REALFOOD LITERACY PROGRAM: $15,000 · OtherFOOD LITERACY PROGRAMREADING PARTNERS: $15,000 · EducationREADING PART…916 INK: $10,000 · Education916 INKSINGLE MOM STRONG INC: $21,950 · Youth DevelopmentSINGLE MOM…Chicks in Crisis Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesChicks in…WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRIN…Roberts Family Development Center: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Sacramento County: $10,000 · Civil RightsMy Sisters House: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$127,247Education$25,000Youth Development$21,950Human Services$20,000Philanthropy$15,000Civil Rights$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSINGLE MOM STRONG INC: $21,950 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Sacramento County: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetChicks in Crisis Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget916 INK: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMy Sisters House: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Teichert FoundationCA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Teichert Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · United Way California Capital Region · American River Bank Foundation · Social Venture Partners of Sacramento · Sierra Health Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · The California Endowment · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Soroptimist International of Sacramento Club 116502 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Soroptimist International of Sacramento Club 116502. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $61k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Soroptimist International of Sacramento Club 116502’s filings →

    More from the funding graph