Skip to content

· Private foundation

Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kAnimals$4kRecreation & Sports$3kReligion$2kHuman Services$720International$700Food & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION$3,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$3,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$3,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,000
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
HELPING ANIMALS LIVE AND OVERCOME INC$1,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$720
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 11%FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $500 → 12%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $200 → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500 → 17%SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $300 → 14%HELPING ANIMALS LIVE AND OVERCOME INC: $1k → 12%THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $1k → 5%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3k → 8%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $300 → 13%CANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $500 → 14%THE ALS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 7%DOG IS MY COPILOT: $500 → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 11%FILM STREAMS: $300 → 12%AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 → 17%SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $300 → 14%HELPING ANIMALS LIVE AND OVERCOME INC: $200 → 12%THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $400 → 5%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $500 → 8%DOG IS MY COPILOT: $300 → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 11%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $2k → 12%SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 14%HELPING ANIMALS LIVE AND OVERCOME INC: $200 → 12%THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $300 → 5%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $500 → 8%THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $300 → 12%UNICEF: $200 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $3k → 14%THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $300 → 5%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $300 → 8%OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $200 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%CONGREGATION KEBILLAH: $720 → 11%BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $520 → 14%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 11%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $520 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $520 → 14%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 → 11%THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150 → 17%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
WY
CA
NE
VA
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 13 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$41k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+17%

Still filing today

85%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +33%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +43%
  • CW
    CANCER WELLNESS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
12
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dog Is My Copilot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,820 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,840 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,600 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,720 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,200 · Health+2 more: $1,300 · HealthAMERICAN RED CROSS: $5,600 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSTEMPLE ISRAEL: $1,500 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1,020 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $720 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $500 · Other+3 more: $800 · Other+3 moreArizona Humane Society: $1,500 · AnimalsArizona H…HELPING ANIMALS LIVE & OVERCOME IN: $1,400 · AnimalsHELPING A…DOG IS MY COPILOT: $1,000 · AnimalsDOG IS MY…WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $200 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 · AnimalsTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,670 · Public Safety & DisasterOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 · International
Health$27,480Other$10,140Animals$4,300Public Safety & Disaster$3,670Environment$3,000International$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,820 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,840 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,670 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,720 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING ANIMALS LIVE & OVERCOME IN: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOG IS MY COPILOT: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Soralee and Jerry Cohn Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Soralee and Jerry Cohn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph