· Private foundation
Someone Elses Child Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $755k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $387k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Apprentice Learning | $65,000 |
| Boch Center | $60,000 |
| Youth Harbors | $60,000 |
| UC Santa Barbara Fdn | $52,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Young Man with a Plan | $50,000 |
| Girls Inc of Lynn | $50,000 |
| Acuavita Foundation | $40,000 |
| Reed Foundation | $35,000 |
| Friends of the Hernandez School | $35,000 |
| Rwanda Youth Partnership | $30,000 |
| Amal Alliance | $30,000 |
| MAIA | $30,000 |
| Hyde Square Task Force | $30,000 |
| Lynn Museum Lynn Arts | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $403k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WANG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $284k · revenue +2%
UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $207k · revenue +224%
THE REAL PROGRAM INC2× · 2020–2021 · $164k · revenue +248% · 72% of their budget
Funded once
- DPDC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $40k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $30k
HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPYone grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue -56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide low income, first generation students who attend selective colleges the skills and resources they need to succeed in college and graduate prepared for careers in competitive and high wage fields. To seek upward mobility for…
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.
Urban Impact is dedicated to prioritizing the reduction of the impact of poverty for families in the Commonwealth. The organization offers a plethora of small business corporate and community opportunities. These opportunities include…
Digital Ready activates the creative potential of young adults, especially low-income residents, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in Boston's innovation economy.
Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…
The principal intent of the organization is to conduct activities to advance education reform in public schools, including public charter schools. specifically, the organization will engage in activities to support and transform…
Our mission is to empower youth who are in foster care, court involved, homeless or out of school to take charge of their lives by taking charge of a business.
Bpe drives exceptional outcomes for all students by developing great teachers and great schools. for three decades, bpe (formerly the boston plan for excellence) has devised solutions to the toughest challenges faced by boston's students…
Educational divide reform, inc. advances the mission to promote global citizenship education, social inclusion and community development through youth education.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To employ, train, and empower youth to, in collaboration with adults, create peace, equity, and justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Smart From the Start Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rebeckha Lynn Whitefield Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WANG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE REAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF BOSTON AND LYNN ↗
- Who funds REED FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Explorers Inc ↗
- Who funds APPRENTICE LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds RWANDA YOUTH PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC ↗
- Who funds Destiny Arts Center ↗
- Who funds ACUAVITA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AUDACITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ARC INC ↗
- Who funds THE HYDE SQUARE TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SCHOOLS FUND ↗
- Who funds THE AMAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SMART FROM THE START INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILD AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds District C ↗
- Who funds PEACE FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBROOK NY INC ↗
- Who funds WALTHAM PARTNERSHIP FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFE HOUSE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SISTERS UNCHAINED INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNCITY DESIGN ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Riley Mabel Louise Tr Uwill · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Wellington Management Foundation · William E Schrafft and Bertha E Schrafft Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Someone Elses Child Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Triangle Inc — 90% of income from government
- Family and Children's Services Inc — 78% of income from government
- Northeast Arc Inc — 73% of income from government
- The Hyde Square Task Force Inc — 52% of income from government
- St Ann's Home Inc — 51% of income from government
- Neighborhood Villages Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores — 30% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn — 28% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc — 26% of income from government
- Building Audacity — 24% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- The Wang Center for the Performing Arts Inc — 10% of income from government
- Leap for Education Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boston Music Project Inc — 9% of income from government
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
- Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
- Smart From the Start Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Sports Museum of New England Inc — 5% of income from government
- Zumix Inc — 5% of income from government
- Waltham Partnership for Youth Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Young Man With a Plan Inc — 3% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Transformative Culture Project Inc F/K/a Press Pass Tv Inc — 2% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Marion Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Breaktime United Inc — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Epiphany School Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Someone Elses Child Inc?
Find your warmest path to Someone Elses Child Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.