Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Solis-Cohen Spigel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$42kRecreation & Sports$31kEducation$14kArts & Culture$11kHuman Services$9kReligion$6kEnvironment$6kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$122k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THINK NEW MEXICO$1,000
CLIMATE CENTRAL$1,000
WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
THE JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$500
FRIENDS OF STRAUS PARK$500
RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY$500
NEW MEXICO APPLESEED$250
NEW JERSEY COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Solis-Cohen Spigel Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 7% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Solis-Cohen Spigel Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$120k · 12 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +103% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$120k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+103%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureScience & TechEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +174%
  • TN
    THINK NEW MEXICO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +255%
  • WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • TT
    THE THANC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -17%
  • LF
    LUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +103%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
8
New Media Ventures

We believe that by changing where capital is invested, we can shift the structures of power to benefit more people.

Public Benefit
9
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
10
New Jersey Innovation Institute Inc

We are an innovative research org. dedicated to revitalizing economic development within nj.

Science & Tech
11
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
12
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Think New Mexico and the most unlike its peers is Rosedale Community Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $46,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEFFERSON MEDICAL COLLEGE — $3,000 · OtherBANK STREET SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN — $3,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF STRAUS PARK INC — $2,500 · Other+7 more — $5,360 · Other+7 moreTHE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION — $25,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATIO…THINK NEW MEXICO — $9,000 · Human ServicesWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $8,500 · Arts & CultureCLIMATE CENTRAL INC — $5,750 · Science & TechRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,000 · HealthLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Health
Other$68,160Recreation & Sports$25,500Human Services$9,000Arts & Culture$8,500Science & Tech$5,750Environment$5,000Health$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION — $25,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO — $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE CENTRAL INC — $5,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROSEDALE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO
  • Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY
  • Who funds CLIMATE CENTRAL INC
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds ROSEDALE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
  • Who funds THE THANC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds LUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY COALITION TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO APPLESEED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Solis-Cohen Spigel Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph