Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
7
Organizations funded FY2023
43%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$7,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 43% of the organizations Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 21% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20237$11k43%
FY20225$8k40%
FY20218$16k38%
FY20206$4k67%
FY20199$26k44%
FY201811$50k55%
FY20178$24kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Civil Rights$80kHealth$18kScience & Tech$15kHuman Services$13kYouth Development$4kArts & Culture$4kReligion$2kEducation$1kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MD
TN
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($106k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCreativity Explored Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation Inc: $4,870 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe College and Community Fellowship Inc: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCommunication First: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHabitot Childrens Museum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Greater Ohio: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLorain County Safe Harbor Corp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity of Hope: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDocs in Progress Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpoke Art Inc (Fka Medicine Wheel Productions Inc): $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeague of Women Voters of Ohio: $400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTash Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation with peer funders

About Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation

How much does Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation give?
Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $11,325 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Civil Rights (58%), Health (13%), Science & Tech (11%).
Who are Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Creativity Explored Inc ($12k), American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation Inc ($5k), The College and Community Fellowship Inc ($4k).
Does Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 43% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation based?
Sol & Doris R Swiss Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sol & Doris R Swiss’ filings →

More from the funding graph