· Private foundation
Sogia Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST PROPHET ELIAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHU | $15,500 |
| STATER BROS CHARITIES | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| BIGHORN INSTITUTE | $2,400 |
| GREEK ORTHODOX PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY | $1,500 |
| ST GEORGE GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $1,500 |
| CREFLO DOLLAR MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| JOSEPH PRINCE MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| SAN FRANCISCO PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY | $300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SPST PROPHET ELIAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHU4× · 2021–2024 · $45k
- SBStater Bros Charities3× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +48%
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2020–2024 · $9k
Funded once
- SPST PROPHET ELIAS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $29k
- SKST KATHERINE GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $4k
- FOFriends of Santa Claus Incone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Offer free meals and basic clothing on site to the homeless or hungry, provide a place of Christian worship and an opportunity to receive counseling to those persons requesting it. This is all done in a dignified manner. The formal mission…
Prodigal Sons Incorporated purpose is to minister and help marginalized individuals and communities throughout Los Angeles. We seek transformation in the lives of gang members and their familites through the ministry of the gospel in…
Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.
Serve the least, the last and lost in the Inland Empire
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
The mission of Rancho Research Institute (RRI) is to conduct medical research and education activities at Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center (Rancho)See Schedule O for more details.
Help commuinity with food during holiday
Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.
Distribute food to nonprofit agencies
This organization provides clothing, food, and medical services to low income citizens in various areas of southern california and reunite them with family
The organization serves as an umbrella organization in a food distribution program to feed 15,000 famalies a christmas meal in southern california.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service Association and the most unlike its peers is Bighorn Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Stater Bros Charities ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIGHORN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Friends of Santa Claus Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Point Loma Rotary Endowment Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BLESSING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sogia Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.