Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Society of Urodynamics & Female Urology Research Foundation Inc

Study of urodynamics and female urology research

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$294kHealth$222kOther$224k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $56,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $117,292 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $61,042 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$12,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$558k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESEARCH FOUND FOR THE SUNY$18,750
Univ of Southern California$12,500
Magee-Womens Research Inst$12,500
Weill Cornell Medicine Dept$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Medtronic Inc: $50k → 7%Magee-Womens Research Inst: $13k → 11%Bd of Trust Leland Standford: $36k → 8%Regents Univ of California: $14k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13k → 14%STONY BROOK UROLOGY UNIV: $25k → 7%Weill Cornell Medicine Dept: $13k → 17%Houston Methodist Res Inst: $8k → 16%William Beaumont Hospital: $25k → 8%Regents Univ of Michigan: $24k → 14%University of Vanderbuilt Med: $13k → 14%THE METRO HEALTH SYSTEM: $13k → 17%VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER: $13k → 9%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $15k → 22%Magee-Womens Research Inst: $13k → 11%Bd of Trust Leland Standford: $13k → 8%Regents Univ of California: $11k → 11%Univ of Southern California: $25k → 14%University of Houston System: $13k → 16%University of Michigan: $22k → 14%University of Vanderbuilt Med: $13k → 14%Bd of Trust Leland Standford: $6k → 8%Regents Univ of California: $6k → 11%Univ of Southern California: $13k → 14%Regents Univ of Michigan: $19k → 14%Univ of Southern California: $13k → 14%University of Michigan: $13k → 14%Univ of Southern California: $13k → 14%Regents Univ of Michigan: $6k → 14%Cedars Sinai Medical Center: $38k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
VA
TN
NC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$277k · 7 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$277k
$323k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+49%

Still filing today

71%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +55%
  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
    3× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +62%
  • Vanderbilt University
    2× · 2018–2019 · $25k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • MC
    MEDTRONIC COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +222%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $38k · revenue +52%
  • EU
    Emory Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
10
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Beaumont Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Medtronic Communities Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $54,292 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD …The Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $37,500 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State Univers…Emory University — $25,000 · EducationEmory UniversityVanderbilt University — $25,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityDUKE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $12,500 · EducationREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $83,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHI…MEDTRONIC COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherMEDTRONIC COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $30,984 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIF…VCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS — $15,000 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSTHE METRO HEALTH SYSTEM — $12,500 · OtherTHE METRO HEALTH SYSTEMUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON — $12,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONMETHODIST HOSPITAL — $7,500 · Other+2 more — $12,500 · Other+2 moreTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $59,898 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $37,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERChildren's Hospital Corporation — $25,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL — $25,000 · HealthWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITALMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AN…Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation — $25,000 · HealthStony Brook Urology University Fac…VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER — $12,500 · HealthVIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTERWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN — $12,500 · HealthWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-P…
Education$294,292Other$224,484Health$222,398

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $59,898 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $54,292 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDTRONIC COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEILL CORNELL IMAGING AT NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Donor Advised Charita…
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Society of Urodynamics & Female Urology Research Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Society of Urodynamics & Female Urology Research Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Society of Urodynamics & Female Urology Research Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines