Skip to content
Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc

The society of st.

$581k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$181k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$562kReligion$450kHuman Services$312kFood & Nutrition$37k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $457,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $580,952 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $123,352 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $201k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $257k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY$180,600
ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH$76,000
HOUSING ACTION COALITION OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC$36,000
ST LUKES$31,000
ST JOHN VIANNEY CHURCH$30,000
ST JAMES MUKWONAGO CONGREGATION$20,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL- FOND DU LAC COUNTY$20,000
CORPUS CHRISTI$15,000
ST JOHN NEUMANN$15,000
ST WILLIAM$13,000
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE$11,000
ST DOMINIC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $181k → 5%ST BENEDICT: $11k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $58k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $125k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $56k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $113k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $50k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $109k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $38k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $108k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $28k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $83k → 5%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $24k → 5%SVDP US COUNCIL: $17k → 5%ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $76k → 5%ST MARY WAUKESHA: $31k → 5%ST JEROME: $10k → 5%ST JOHN VIANNEY CHURCH: $30k → 5%SVDP US COUNCIL: $6k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +86% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+86%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $743k · revenue +24% · 98% of their budget
  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $231k · revenue +177%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +126% · 56% of their budget

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +14%
  • SD
    ST DOMINIC CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County

We provide financial and spiritual aid to the underprivileged, including rent and utility assistance, food, clothing, household items so they can meet their financial obligations caused by unexpected circumstances. We served over 46 people…

—
2
Society of St Vincent De Paul of Waukesha County Inc St Charles

Serve the poor

Human Services
3
Society of St Vincent De Paul Waukesha Co Inc St Teresa of Calcutta

In accordance with the Society's mission and rules, the Conference provides assistance to SVDP Council programs. It also operates the North Lake Food Pantry providing food assistance to the hungry and provides assistance to individuals who…

Human Services
4
St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen

Charity

—
5
Society of St Vincent De Paul St Peter Huron

We seek to bring emergency financial assistance to people in need through assistance with rent, utilities, food, clothing, and other emergency needs in an effort to prevent homelessness.

Religion
6
St Vincent De Paul Society of Epiphany Cathedral Conference Inc

To aid and assist those in need by providing rent, electrical, water, auto repair, and other basic assistance.

Human Services
7
Society of St Vincent de Paul St Pius V Conference

The Society of St. Vincent de Paul is a world-wide Catholic organization that provides food and other services to the poor. It receives this funding primarily from Catholics. Local units of St. Vincent de Paul Society are called…

Human Services
8
Society of St Vincent De Paul Superior District Council

The primary purpose of the Society of St Vincent de Paul is to provide aid and financial assistance to the poor who seek our help.

Public Benefit
9
Society of St Vincent De Paul Racine County Council Inc

Provide food,clothing,shelter,utilities,spiritual and compassionate assistance for needy families primarily in racine county

Religion
10
Society of St Vincent De Paul St Joseph

To provide food to County families and individuals who currently live at or below the Federal Poverty guidelines

—
11
St Vincent De Paul Pro-Life Homeless Inc

Help for homeless

—
12
Society of Saint Vincent De Paul Nativity Conference Inc

The Society of St. Vincent de Paul is a worldwide organization of lay Catholics, following Christ's call to serve the poor, the suffering, and the deprived.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Housing Action Coalition of Waukesha County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS: $743,051 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMASST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE: $230,781 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEESOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $106,963 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC+4 more: $73,428 · Human Services+4 moreST JOSEPH PARISH: $240,988 · OtherST JOSEPH PARISHSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC St John Neumann: $87,597 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKES…ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $52,708 · OtherST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCHHope Center Inc: $43,841 · OtherHope Center IncST LUKES: $31,000 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $29,250 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA CO OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE: $22,000 · OtherST JAMES CONGREGATION: $21,000 · Other+7 more: $100,000 · Other+7 moreHousing Action Coalition of Waukesha County Inc: $36,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,154,223Other$628,384Housing & Shelter$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS: $743,051 over 8y, 98% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE: $230,781 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $106,963 over 3y, 56% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC St John Neumann: $87,597 over 5y, 58% of budgetHope Center Inc: $43,841 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetHousing Action Coalition of Waukesha County Inc: $36,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $23,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL- FOND DU LAC COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST WILLIAM: $13,000 over 1y, 26% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Archdiocese of Milwau…Baird Foundation IncVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home