Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc

The society of st.

$415k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fund
0164% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192024.

Human Services$868kOther$493k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $218,851 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $415,327 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $196,476 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$21,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL$55,536
ST JOHN NEUMANN$44,597
ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH$33,287
ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY$24,249
ST JOHN VIANNEY CHURCH$21,000
ST JAMES CONGREGATION$15,000
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE$11,000
HOPE CENTER$8,182
HOLY APOSTLES ST VINCENT DEPAUL$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $868k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $125k → 5%ST BENEDICT: $11k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $58k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $113k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $56k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $109k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $50k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $108k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $38k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $83k → 5%ST VINCENT DE PAUL MILWAUKEE COUNCIL: $28k → 17%ST DISMAS JAIL MINISTRY: $24k → 5%SVDP US COUNCIL: $17k → 5%ST MARY WAUKESHA: $31k → 5%ST JEROME: $10k → 5%SVDP US COUNCIL: $6k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 10 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$1.3M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+86%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $562k · revenue +24% · 98% of their budget
  • ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $231k · revenue +177%
  • HC
    Hope Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INCgraduated
    2× · 2017–2019 · $31k · revenue +126%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +14%
  • SD
    ST DOMINIC CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County

We provide financial and spiritual aid to the underprivileged, including rent and utility assistance, food, clothing, household items so they can meet their financial obligations caused by unexpected circumstances. We served over 46 people…

2
Society of St Vincent De Paul of Waukesha County Inc St Charles

Serve the poor

Human Services
3
Society of St Vincent De Paul of Waukesha County Inc

Assistance to poor and needy persons.

Human Services
4
Society of St Vincent De Paul Waukesha Co Inc St Teresa of Calcutta

In accordance with the Society's mission and rules, the Conference provides assistance to SVDP Council programs. It also operates the North Lake Food Pantry providing food assistance to the hungry and provides assistance to individuals who…

Human Services
5
St Vincent DePaul Soup Kitchen

Charity

6
Society of St Vincent De Paul St Peter Huron

We seek to bring emergency financial assistance to people in need through assistance with rent, utilities, food, clothing, and other emergency needs in an effort to prevent homelessness.

Religion
7
Society of St Vincent De Paul - Twin Cities
Philanthropy
8
Society of St Vincent De Paul Racine County Council Inc

Provide food,clothing,shelter,utilities,spiritual and compassionate assistance for needy families primarily in racine county

Religion
9
Society of St Vincent de Paul St Pius V Conference

The Society of St. Vincent de Paul is a world-wide Catholic organization that provides food and other services to the poor. It receives this funding primarily from Catholics. Local units of St. Vincent de Paul Society are called…

Human Services
10
Society of St Vincent De Paul Superior District Council

The primary purpose of the Society of St Vincent de Paul is to provide aid and financial assistance to the poor who seek our help.

Public Benefit
11
St Vincent De Paul Society of Epiphany Cathedral Conference Inc

To aid and assist those in need by providing rent, electrical, water, auto repair, and other basic assistance.

Human Services
12
Society of St Vincent De Paul St Joseph

To provide food to County families and individuals who currently live at or below the Federal Poverty guidelines

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society of St Vincent De Paul of Waukesha County Inc St John Neumann and the most unlike its peers is Hope Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS — $562,451 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMASST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE — $230,781 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEESOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $30,963 · Human Services+3 more — $43,428 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH PARISH — $240,988 · OtherST JOSEPH PARISHSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC St John Neumann — $72,597 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA…ST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $52,708 · OtherST MARY CATHOLIC CHURCHHope Center Inc — $43,841 · OtherHope Center IncST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH — $29,250 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCHST JAMES CONGREGATION — $21,000 · Other+3 more — $33,000 · Other+3 more
Human Services$867,623Other$493,384

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ST DISMAS — $562,451 over 7y, 98% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE — $230,781 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC St John Neumann — $72,597 over 4y, 58% of budgetHope Center Inc — $43,841 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $23,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph