Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Society of Family Planning Research Fund

The sfp research fund provides support for abortion and contraception research.

$2.2M
Granted FY2022
25
Grants FY2022
16
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.

Health$21MEducation$6.6MEmployment$1.5MRecreation & Sports$139kScience & Tech$75kCivil Rights$51k
02FY2022 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 25 grants below total $676,167 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,172,771 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,496,604 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k11 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $449k
$24,984
Median grant
16
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMORY UNIVERSITY$60,000
Regents of the University of Nebraska$60,000
University of Texas at San Antonio$59,609
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$56,351
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRAN$55,687
OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY$55,091
Ibis Reproductive Health$52,143
Rutgers The State University of New Jersey RBHS$50,116
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO$31,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY BEASLEY SCHOOL OF LAW$28,914
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$25,000
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center$25,000
Westchester Medical Center$24,984
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSIT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$12,919
Indiana University$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $157k → 8%IF WHEN HOW: $211k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO: $166k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $150k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $665k → 16%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $276k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $1.9M → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $200k → 12%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $132k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $199k → 11%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $584k → 8%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $267k → 12%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $120k → 18%SISTERLOVE INC: $300k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $173k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $195k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $135k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $324k → 9%Rutgers The State University of New Jersey RBHS: $118k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $120k → 19%Ibis Reproductive Health: $426k → 8%Regents of the University of California Davis: $134k → 16%GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE: $300k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $110k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $188k → 10%Medical University of South Carolina: $120k → 12%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $128k → 11%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $145k → 12%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $159k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER: $120k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2.0M → 22%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $167k → 14%IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: $286k → 8%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $134k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $187k → 22%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $300k → 28%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $124k → 14%BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $120k → 16%NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM: $910k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $137k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $320k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $160k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS: $458k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $129k → 14%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $120k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $530k → 17%GYNUITY HEALTH PROJECTS: $317k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS: $245k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 49 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

49 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2022, 28 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
51

Total granted

$22M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+34%

Still filing today

47%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthCivil RightsInternationalRecreation & SportsMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2017–2021 · $783k · revenue +56%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $738k · revenue +36%
  • EU
    Emory University
    5× · 2017–2022 · $558k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM
    one grant, 2021 · $910k · revenue -14%
  • GH
    GYNUITY HEALTH PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $317k · revenue -59%
  • SI
    SISTERLOVE INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
11
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Interfaith Voices for Repro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%54%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%54%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/110
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,455

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/70
Grantees still filing
62/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $6,011,795 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $2,172,623 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY — $1,073,439 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS — $806,154 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC — $715,229 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $652,490 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $641,035 · Other+40 more — $4,524,608 · Other+40 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,303,719 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…University of Chicago — $783,490 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $722,719 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U…Emory University — $557,865 · EducationEmory UniversityWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $444,552 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $355,525 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $241,111 · EducationYale University — $234,851 · Education+25 more — $1,279,425 · Education+25 moreIBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $863,872 · HealthIBIS REPRODUCTIV…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $737,745 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHO…BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $420,410 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL C…GYNUITY HEALTH PROJECTS INC — $316,648 · HealthGYNUITY HEALTH P…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $249,728 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHO…MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $229,788 · HealthMAGEE-WOMENS RES…MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $199,902 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $151,710 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $144,833 · Health+14 more — $855,362 · Health+14 moreNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $910,201 · Civil RightsIFWHENHOW — $210,924 · Civil Rights+1 more — $7,500 · Civil RightsSISTERLOVE INCORPORATED — $299,959 · InternationalIPAS — $120,000 · InternationalNorthwestern University — $231,647 · Recreation & SportsNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE VEBA TRUST — $38,250 · Membership Benefit
Other$16,597,373Education$6,923,257Health$4,169,998Civil Rights$1,128,625International$419,959Recreation & Sports$231,647Membership Benefit$38,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,303,719 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $910,201 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetIBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $863,872 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $783,490 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $737,745 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $722,719 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC — $715,229 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University — $557,865 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $444,552 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $420,410 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $355,525 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc — $343,200 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetGYNUITY HEALTH PROJECTS INC — $316,648 over 1y, 16% of budgetSISTERLOVE INCORPORATED — $299,959 over 1y, 17% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $249,728 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $241,111 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $234,851 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $231,647 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $229,788 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIFWHENHOW — $210,924 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $199,902 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $151,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $144,833 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $142,387 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $138,416 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $135,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY CLINICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH ASSOCIATES (UCERA) — $123,139 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $122,774 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation — $120,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIPAS — $120,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $98,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $94,454 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $78,134 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $77,380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth Foundation — $74,930 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC — $70,364 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER — $59,987 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $59,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $59,718 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $59,189 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $57,828 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY — $46,608 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $45,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE VEBA TRUST — $38,250 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM ↗
  • Who funds IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GYNUITY HEALTH PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTERLOVE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IFWHENHOW ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan Thompson Bu…American Cancer Socie…The Trustees of Colum…New Venture FundJohns Hopkins Univers…The Children's Hospit…Vanderbilt University…Yale UniversityEmory UniversityAmerican Heart Associ…Society of Family Pla…Cystic Fibrosis Found…
The Susan Thompson Buffett FoundationNE21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · New Venture Fund · Johns Hopkins University · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Yale University · Emory University · American Heart Association Inc · Society of Family Planning · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Society of Family Planning Research Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Baystate Medical Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Ibis Reproductive Health Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Society of Family Planning Research Fund?

Find your warmest path to Society of Family Planning Research Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home