Skip to content

· Public charity

Society for Science & the Public

Society for science is a champion for science, dedicated to expanding scientific literacy, effective stem education and scientific research.

$5.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$1.4MEducation$453kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $202,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,124,534 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,922,534 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $116k
$8,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$165M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS$20,000
BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE$18,000
WILLIAM A SHINE GREAT NECK SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL$14,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY$14,000
BERGEN COUNTY ACADEMIES$10,000
OSSINING HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
PAUL D SCHREIBER HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SCIENCE FAIR DIRECTORS INSTITUTE$10,000
THE HARKER SCHOOL$10,000
PLANO WEST SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
HERRICKS HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
SYOSSET HIGH SCHOOL$8,000
ROSLYN HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
GREENWICH HIGH SCHOOL 1$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SCIENCE FAIR DIRECTORS INSTITUTE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 35 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
36

Total granted

$1.6M
$282k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+16%

Still filing today

20%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationScience & TechPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +531%
  • TH
    THE HARKER SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +38%
  • CC
    Canyon Crest Academy Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +64%
  • SH
    SCARSDALE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Princeton International School of Mathematics and Science Inc

The purpose of the school is to promote, advance and sponsor charitable and educational activities.

Education
2
Society for Science & the Public

Society for science is a champion for science, dedicated to expanding scientific literacy, effective stem education and scientific research.

Science & Tech
3
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
4
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
7
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
8
St John's School

See Schedule OSt. John's School is an independent, co-educational day school presenting a 13-year sequence of college preparatory training. A non-profit institution, it was founded in 1946 to provide the community with a school of exacting…

—
9
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
Baxter Academies of Maine

The baxter academies of maine is an educational institution that established and operates public charter schools in maine.

Education
12
Highland Prep

Highland prep is a science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) college-preparatory high school. highland prep features a rigorous academic program with an emphasis on 21st century preparation defined by critical thinking and inquiry…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Highland Preparatory School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Science Fair Directors Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: $140,000 · OtherNYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONBERGEN COUNTY ACADEMIES: $110,000 · OtherBERGEN COUNTY ACADEMIESNORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $108,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATIONMontgomery County Public Schools: $104,000 · OtherMontgomery County Public SchoolsJERICHO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: $86,000 · OtherJERICHO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLTHOMAS JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: $86,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL FOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYOSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $76,000 · Otherbyram hills central school district: $62,000 · OtherGREAT NECK UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $60,000 · OtherTOWN OF GREENWICH REGISTRAR OF VOTERS: $58,000 · OtherSYOSSET HIGH SCHOOL: $54,000 · Other+49 more: $643,800 · Other+49 moreTHE HARKER SCHOOL: $86,000 · EducationTHE HARKER SCHO…BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 · EducationBRONX HIGH SCHO…TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF PHI…Canyon Crest Academy Foundation Inc: $26,000 · EducationCanyon Crest Ac…NORTH CAROLINA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR: $18,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA …JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS U…PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $12,000 · EducationSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $10,000 · Education+4 more: $27,000 · Education+4 moreSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR OF MET: $10,000 · Science & TechSCIENCE FAIR DIRECTORS INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Human ServicesScience Engineering Fair of Houston Inc: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,587,800Education$258,000Science & Tech$10,000Human Services$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $108,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HARKER SCHOOL: $86,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCanyon Crest Academy Foundation Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE SCIENCE FAIR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSCIENCE FAIR DIRECTORS INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSouthern AZ Research Science & Eng FDN: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLAKE HIGHLAND PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKEYSTONE SCHOOL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLINGTON SCHOOL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNUEVA SCHOOL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HARKER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BRONX HIGH SCHOOL OF SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Canyon Crest Academy Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FAIR OF MET ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST)NH41.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Broadcom Foundation · GenYOUTH Incorporated · The Asia Society · Action for Healthy Kids · Folds of Honor Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Round It Up America Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · I Car Education Foundation · Share Our Strength · Project Lead the Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society for Science & the Public funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society for Science & the Public. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 11% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Society for Science & the Public’s filings →

More from the funding graph