Skip to content
Social Impact Partners Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Social Impact Partners Inc

Social Impact Partners ("SIP") is an innovative nonprofit organization dedicated to closing the opportunity divide in Connecticut by expanding pathways to living wage jobs and economic mobility for all, working with partners across the nonprofit, business, higher education, and government sectors, at the local and statewide level, to…

$318k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$775kPublic Benefit$225kCivil Rights$165kYouth Development$150kEducation$127kEmployment$111kPhilanthropy$75kCommunity Improvement$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $307,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $317,879 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,379 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
State of Connecticut$200,000
Connecticut Network for Children and Youth$25,000
The Riverfront Children's Center$25,000
Norwalk ACTS$25,000
West Haven Child Development Center Inc$25,000
Connecticut Council for Philanthropy$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%The Riverfront Children's Center: $25k → 9%Sickle Cell Disease Association of America Southern Connecticut: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$402k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-1%

Still filing today

89%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +387%
  • CAREER RESOURCES INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $66k · revenue +64%
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue -44%
  • AH
    ACHIEVE HARTFORD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue -100%
  • HB
    HORIZONS BRIDGEPORT
    one grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue -90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Business Development Council Inc

The mission of the women's business development council (wbdc) is to support economic prosperity for women and strengthen communities through entrepreneurial and financial education services that create and grow sustainable jobs and…

Education
2
Connecticut Association for the Education of Young Children Inc

To enhance the care, education, and development of Connecticut's young children, in the context of family, and community; and to support the professionals who care for them. CTAEYC provides training to increase the competencies of…

—
3
The Children's Community Programs of Ct

The children's community programs of connecticut, inc., is a nonprofit, multi-service agency whose mission is to provide diverse and creative support services to children and families throughout connecticut.

Health
4
The Workplace Inc

The organization provides job training, placement, and counseling for dislocated and economically disadvantaged individuals in the bridgeport, norwalk, stamford and valley labor market areas.

Employment
5
Workforce Alliance Inc

Provide job training through various programs.

—
6
United Way of Greater New Haven Inc

United way of greater new haven brings people and organizations together to create solutions to our region's most pressing challenges in the areas of education, health, and financial stability, grounded in racial and social justice. we…

Philanthropy
7
Eastern Connecticut Workforce Investment Board Inc

EWIB efficiently coordinates employment-related services in concert with a multitude of state and local agencies at benefit to both businesses and job-seekers. These services offer new opportunities and/or skills to the regional workforce,…

Employment
8
Leadership Education and Athletics in Partnership Inc

Leap empowers young people to be leaders who create a nurturing community for children in need. we believe that families in all neighborhoods deserve access to learning opportunities that inspire a broad world view and encourage young…

Education
9
Capitol Child Development Center Inc

Non-profit organization which was founded by the state of ct general assembly as a model for employer - sponsored childcare programs.

—
10
Ct Community Nonprofit Alliance Inc

To advance excellence in community-based nonprofits in connecticut.

Health
11
Community Solutions Inc

Positively impacting the lives of our clients and their communities by providing services that facilitate skill development, enhance responsible citizenship, and increase overall well-being.

Health
12
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norwalk Acts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sickel Cell Disease Association of America-Ct. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STATE OF CONNECTICUT: $950,000 · OtherSTATE OF CONNECTICUTCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC: $125,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC+13 more: $362,000 · Other+13 moreCAREER RESOURCES INC: $66,095 · EmploymentTHE GREATER BRIDGEPORT OIC INC: $45,000 · EmploymentREADYCT INC: $45,000 · EducationACHIEVE HARTFORD INC: $35,000 · EducationNORWALK ACTS INC: $70,000 · Community ImprovementCONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterRiverfront Childrens Center Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesSickel Cell Disease Association of America-CT: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$1,437,000Employment$111,095Education$80,000Community Improvement$70,000Philanthropy$55,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Human Services$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC: $125,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetNORWALK ACTS INC: $70,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCAREER RESOURCES INC: $66,095 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GREATER BRIDGEPORT OIC INC: $45,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetREADYCT INC: $45,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetACHIEVE HARTFORD INC: $35,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY: $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHORIZONS BRIDGEPORT: $27,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetDOMUS KIDS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWEST HAVEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFIVE FROGS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetEMERGE CONNECTICUT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRiverfront Childrens Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSickel Cell Disease Association of America-CT: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEW HAVEN CHILDRENS IDEAL LEARNING DISTRICT INC C/O KIA LEVEY-BURDEN: $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William Caspar Graust…Fairfield County's Co…Liberty Bank Foundati…Hartford Foundation f…Nellie Mae Education …The Community Foundat…Tauck Family Foundati…Peoples United Commun…Yale UniversityRitter Family Foundat…The Connecticut Proje…Lone Pine Foundation …
William Caspar Graustein Memorial FundCT28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Tauck Family Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation · Yale University · Ritter Family Foundation · The Connecticut Project Inc · Lone Pine Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Social Impact Partners Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Social Impact Partners Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc: 70% of income from government
  • Readyct Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Hispanic Coalition of Greater Waterbury: 53% of income from government
  • The Greater Bridgeport Oic Inc: 53% of income from government
  • Emerge Connecticut Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Career Resources Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Connecticut Council for Philanthropy: 24% of income from government
  • Riverfront Childrens Center Inc: 21% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Art Council of Greater New Haven Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Domus Kids Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Norwalk Acts Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Social Impact Partners’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home