· Public charity
Social Impact Partners Inc
Social Impact Partners ("SIP") is an innovative nonprofit organization dedicated to closing the opportunity divide in Connecticut by expanding pathways to living wage jobs and economic mobility for all, working with partners across the nonprofit, business, higher education, and government sectors, at the local and statewide level, to…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $307,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $317,879 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,379 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| State of Connecticut | $200,000 |
| Norwalk ACTS | $25,000 |
| West Haven Child Development Center Inc | $25,000 |
| The Riverfront Children's Center | $25,000 |
| Connecticut Network for Children and Youth | $25,000 |
| Connecticut Council for Philanthropy | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CNCONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC2× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +387%
CAREER RESOURCES INC2× · 2021–2022 · $66k · revenue +64%- TOTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INCone grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue -44%
- AHACHIEVE HARTFORD INCone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue -100%
- HBHORIZONS BRIDGEPORTone grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue -90%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The children's community programs of connecticut, inc., is a nonprofit, multi-service agency whose mission is to provide diverse and creative support services to children and families throughout connecticut.
To enhance the care, education, and development of Connecticut's young children, in the context of family, and community; and to support the professionals who care for them. CTAEYC provides training to increase the competencies of…
The organization provides job training, placement, and counseling for dislocated and economically disadvantaged individuals in the bridgeport, norwalk, stamford and valley labor market areas.
Leap empowers young people to be leaders who create a nurturing community for children in need. we believe that families in all neighborhoods deserve access to learning opportunities that inspire a broad world view and encourage young…
Provide job training through various programs.
United way of greater new haven brings people and organizations together to create solutions to our region's most pressing challenges in the areas of education, health, and financial stability, grounded in racial and social justice. we…
Positively impacting the lives of our clients and their communities by providing services that facilitate skill development, enhance responsible citizenship, and increase overall well-being.
To advance excellence in community-based nonprofits in connecticut.
Non-profit organization which was founded by the state of ct general assembly as a model for employer - sponsored childcare programs.
EWIB efficiently coordinates employment-related services in concert with a multitude of state and local agencies at benefit to both businesses and job-seekers. These services offer new opportunities and/or skills to the regional workforce,…
United way coastal and western connecticut (uwcwc) envisions a community where every person is healthy, safe, and economically secure. our mission is to work in partnership with community to address critical needs and advance equitable…
To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Norwalk Acts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sickel Cell Disease Association of America-Ct. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONNECTICUT NETWORK FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds NORWALK ACTS INC ↗
- Who funds CAREER RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER BRIDGEPORT OIC INC ↗
- Who funds READYCT INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC COALITION OF GREATER WATERBURY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE HARTFORD INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS BRIDGEPORT ↗
- Who funds DOMUS KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST HAVEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Riverfront Childrens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds EMERGE CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sickel Cell Disease Association of America-CT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ART COUNCIL OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds FIVE FROGS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN CHILDRENS IDEAL LEARNING DISTRICT INC C/O KIA LEVEY-BURDEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · Tauck Family Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation · Yale University · Ritter Family Foundation · The Connecticut Project Inc · Lone Pine Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Social Impact Partners Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc — 70% of income from government
- Readyct Inc — 61% of income from government
- Hispanic Coalition of Greater Waterbury — 53% of income from government
- The Greater Bridgeport Oic Inc — 53% of income from government
- Emerge Connecticut Inc — 47% of income from government
- Career Resources Inc — 35% of income from government
- Connecticut Council for Philanthropy — 24% of income from government
- Riverfront Childrens Center Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Open Door Shelter Inc — 14% of income from government
- Art Council of Greater New Haven Inc — 14% of income from government
- Domus Kids Inc — 7% of income from government
- Norwalk Acts Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.