Skip to content

· Private foundation

Soar Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$130kReligion$103kPhilanthropy$84kHealth$32kEducation$20kHuman Services$10kCommunity Improvement$10kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE ISRAEL$8,448
U OF MN$5,000
LAARETZ$1,800
STEADMAN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$92
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAARETZ: $885 → 20%LAARETZ: $2k → 20%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 19 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
36

Total granted

$322k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+28%

Still filing today

53%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Chopra Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $29k · revenue +32%
  • TA
    The Art Base
    3× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +159%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • N9
    NUMBER 9 MEDIA
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • DF
    DEEPAK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $24k
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies

The Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies (FAPE) is dedicated to enhancing the United States' image abroad through American Art. Founded as a public-private, non-partisan partnership in 1986, FAPE works with the U.S. Department…

Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
5
The Goldenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
10
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
11
Afe Foundation

We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…

Health
12
Chaim Maleh Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis; the most unlike its peers is Living Legacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL: $74,094 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELNUMBER 9 MEDIA: $35,000 · OtherNUMBER 9 MEDIAIndividual grant recipient: $26,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEEPAK FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherDEEPAK FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FOUNDATION: $16,500 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $15,000 · OtherCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $12,000 · Other+35 more: $84,527 · Other+35 moreSING FOR HOPE INC: $67,500 · Arts & CultureSING FOR HOPE INCThe Art Base: $17,400 · Arts & CultureThe Art BaseCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $17,500 · PhilanthropyLIVING LEGACY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFLAHERTY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyChopra Foundation: $28,728 · Health+2 more: $500 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · ReligionBECOMING FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · ReligionSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 · Environment+1 more: $200 · EnvironmentJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $5,000 · Human ServicesLA-ARETZ: $2,685 · Human Services
Other$305,157Arts & Culture$89,400Philanthropy$30,500Health$29,228Religion$18,000Environment$10,200Human Services$7,685

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSING FOR HOPE INC: $67,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetChopra Foundation: $28,728 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Base: $17,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLIVING LEGACY: $10,000 over 2y, 78% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBECOMING FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFLAHERTY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA-ARETZ: $2,685 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $1,090 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MN MINNESOTANORTH DAKOTASOUTH DAKOTA: $1,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION BEYOND BORDERS FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SING FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Chopra Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds The Art Base ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BECOMING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAHERTY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LA-ARETZ ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Dotopia · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Soar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Soar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Soar Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Soar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Soar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph