Skip to content

· Private foundation

Snyder White Oaks of Delaware Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$330kEducation$154kRecreation & Sports$56kFood & Nutrition$46kYouth Development$39kHousing & Shelter$16kPublic Benefit$6kInternational$5k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
$15,396
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIRY'S LIST$24,229
MINISTRY OF CARING$20,696
URBAN BIKE PROJECT$20,696
BLACKPACKERS$15,396
HELP US ADOPT$8,329
THE GATHERING PLACE$8,329
WORK TO RIDE$8,329
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MIRY'S LIST: $42k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $25k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $24k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $19k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $16k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $11k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $6k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $3k → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Snyder White Oaks of Delaware Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Snyder White Oaks of Delaware Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$650k · 11 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -41% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$650k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-41%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BLACKPACKERS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $56k · revenue +41%
  • HI
    HELPUSADOPTORG INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +506%
  • WT
    WORK TO RIDE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • GF
    GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Wicomico County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity wicomico adheres to a…

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat for Humanity of Tompkins & Cortland Counties

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope and realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity of tompkins and…

—
3
Habitat for Humanity of Wake County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity of wake county brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
5
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Nashville

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
6
Syracuse Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. syracuse habitat for humanity adheres to a…

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity International Chemung County

Chemung county habitat is dedicated to eliminating substandard housing locally and worldwide through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access…

—
8
Urban Bicycle Food Ministry
Human Services
9
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put gods love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
10
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Fredericksburg Texas Inc

Provision of decent, affordable housing for lower income families.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of Delaware and Union Counties

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity of delaware and union…

Housing & Shelter
12
Fayettville Area Habitat for Humanity

Habitat for humanity is part of a global, nonprofit housing organization operated on christian principles that seeks to put god's love into action by building homes, communities and hope. habitat for humanity is dedicated to eliminating…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Work to Ride Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grameen Foundation Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MINISTRY OF CARING INC: $131,594 · OtherTHE MINISTRY OF CARING INCTHE GATHERING PLACE: $45,911 · OtherTHE GATHERING PLACEWORK TO RIDE INC: $39,211 · OtherWORK TO RIDE INCTEACH FOR AMERICA: $37,933 · OtherTEACH FOR AMERICAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $16,346 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY+1 more: $3,200 · OtherMIRY'S LIST: $147,227 · Human ServicesMIRY'S LISTHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $50,711 · Human ServicesHELPUSADOPTORG INCURBAN BIKE PROJECT OF WILMINGTON INC: $115,661 · EducationURBAN BIKE PROJECT O…BLACKPACKERS: $56,015 · Recreation & SportsBLACKPACK…CATO INSTITUTE: $6,400 · Public BenefitGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $1,800 · International
Other$274,195Human Services$197,938Education$115,661Recreation & Sports$56,015Public Benefit$6,400International$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIRY'S LIST: $147,227 over 9y, 14% of budgetTHE MINISTRY OF CARING INC: $131,594 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN BIKE PROJECT OF WILMINGTON INC: $115,661 over 7y, 20% of budgetBLACKPACKERS: $56,015 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $50,711 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWORK TO RIDE INC: $39,211 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $16,346 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $6,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIRY'S LIST ↗
  • Who funds THE MINISTRY OF CARING INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN BIKE PROJECT OF WILMINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACKPACKERS ↗
  • Who funds HELPUSADOPTORG INC ↗
  • Who funds WORK TO RIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Snyder White Oaks of Delaware Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Snyder White Oaks of Delaware Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • The Ministry of Caring Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity of New Castle County: 21% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Snyder White Oaks of Delaware’s filings →

More from the funding graph